Revista de Gastroenterología de México Revista de Gastroenterología de México
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2009;74:71-3 - Vol. 74 Núm.01

La capacidad gástrica se relaciona con el índice de masa corporal en pacientes con obesidad. Un estudio utilizando la prueba de carga de agua

M. Mejía-Rivasa, JM. Remes-Trocheb, A. Montaño-Lozaa, M.Herrerac, MA. Valdovinos-Díaza

a Gastroenterology and Surgery Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico City, Mexico
b Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Cristóbal Colón, Veracruz, México
c Digestive Physiology and Motility, Medical and Biological Research Institute, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz

Keywords

obesity, body mass index, water load test, Mexico.

Resumen

Antecedentes: El papel de la función gastrointesti-nal en la obesidad es desconocido. Estudios recien-tes han mostrado que la saciedad en los obesos está incluida por una capacidad gástrica anormal. Propósito: Evaluar cómo se relaciona la prueba de carga de agua (WLT), herramienta sencilla y no invasiva utilizada para evaluar la capacidad gástrica, con el índice de masa corporal (BMI) en los obesos. Métodos: La WLT fue realizada a 32 pacientes con BMI alto y a 12 voluntarios sanos. El agua fue ingerida a una medida de 15 mL/minuto. El volu-men máximo tolerado (MTV) fue definido como el total ingerido en cuanto los pacientes detuvie-ron la prueba. Resultados: Un BMI > 30, fue asociado signifi-cativamente con altos consumos de agua (2339 ± 306 mL) comparado con los controles (1830 ± 240 mL, p = 0.001). El MTV tuvo una correlación positiva con el BMI (r = 068, p = 0.001). Conclusiones: Los sujetos obesos tienen una capa-cidad gástrica incrementada, medida por la WLT. Esta mayor capacidad para ingerir agua, tiene una correlación positiva con el BMI de los pacientes.

Artículo

Introduction

Obesity is nowadays considered a systemic disorder consequence of an energy intake greater than the energy expenditure, and influenced by several factors such as genetics, environment, behavior and socioeconomics.1 The role of gastrointestinal tract function in obesity remains largely unknown, but recent studies have shed new light on the underlying pathophysiology.1-4 For example, it is now known that the stomach sensory function plays a key role in feeding control, and that satiety is determined by gastric motor function, including tone, accommodation and emptying. Gastric motility disorders reported in obese patients include an increased gastric capacity,3,4 increased postprandial accommodation5,6 and increased gastric emptying.7 A better understanding of changes in motor and sensitive gastric functions in obesity is necessary for the development of adequate and new therapeutic options.

Many techniques such as gastric barostat, ultrasound, SPECT imaging, and gastric emptying scintigraphy have been used to evaluate gastric function. Some of these techniques are invasive and uncomfortable, while others are expensive, not well standardized, highly user dependent, or not widely available. The water load test (WLT) has emerged as a non-invasive, reliable, easy and inexpensive method to evaluate gastric capacity for liquids, and to indirectly evaluate accommodation, sensitivity and gastric emptying.8

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between BMI and gastric capacity using a WLT.

Methods

In an experimental and controlled study, 32 consecutive subjects with high BMI (36 ± 8 years of age, 22 females) attending the outpatient Bariatric Surgery Clinic at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán" (INCMNSZ) in Mexico City were studied. Patients were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) as: a) overweight (OW, BMI > 25 kg/m2 and < 30 kg/m2) n = 5, b) grade I obesity (OI, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and < 35 kg/m2) n = 4, c) grade II obesity (OII, BMI 3 35 kg/m2 and < 40 kg/m2) n = 7, d) grade III obesity (OIII, BMI 3 40 kg/ m2) n = 16.4

Twelve non-obese healthy volunteers (30.5 ± 9 years of age, 10 females) were used as controls. The protocol was approved by the INCMNSZ Institutional Committee for Human Research, and all subjects signed an informed consent.

After an overnight fast of 8 hours, patients arrived at the Motility Unit of the INCMNSZ, an academic, third level, referral center. The WLT was performed by having the subjects drink room-temperature tap water at a predetermined rate of 15 mL/min as reported elsewhere.8 Severity of dyspeptic symptoms was evaluated every 5 min using a 5-point Likert scale. When either a score of 5 was reached for any of the symptoms, or the subject could not tolerate more volume, the test was stopped and the total ingested volume (mL) was registered. The MTV was defined as the total ingested volume.

Symptoms scores and volumes are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparisons for each group were done using c2 and Mann-Whitney tests, when appropriate. For multiple comparisons, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Pearson (r) test was used to establish correlations for MTV between WLT and symptom scores.

Results

BMI values were (mean ± SD): 22.3 ± 2 kg/m2 in HV; 27.8 ±1.74 kg/m2 in OW; 33.4±1.9 kg/m2 in OI; 38.2 ± 1.65 kg/m2 in OII; and 43.3± 1.78 kg/m2 in OIII.

There were no overall differences among groups for age (p = 0.56) and gender (p = 0.78) (data not shown). There were also no differences for MTV according to gender (p = 0.85) (data not shown). Patients with OII and OIII had significantly higher MTV (2089 ± 358 mL and 2339 ± 306 mL) (HV: 1830 ± 240 mL, OW: 1783 ± 286 mL, OI: 2006 ± 510 mL), p = 0.001 (Figure 1). Furthermore, MTV had a positive correlation with BMI (r = 0.68, p = 0.001).

Figure 1.  Maximal tolerated volume during the WLT among groups. * p = 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis Test.

Figure 1.  Maximal tolerated volume during the WLT among groups. * p = 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis Test.

Bloating and satiety were the most frequently reported symptoms that made HV and patients with a high BMI stop the WLT test. The severity scores were also similar between HV and obese subjects.

Discussion

Several studies have been recently conducted to evaluate gastric function and its role in the pathogenesis of obesity. In this study, we found that BMI had a positive correlation with greater gastric capacity in obese subjects.

As gastric distention after food ingestion is a key mechanism to induce satiation, it has been suggested that obese subjects have greater food consumption because the volume needed to induce a gastric distention that elicits the feeling of fullness is higher compared to that in controls.3-6 Using invasive (gastric latex balloon distension) and non-invasive methods (SPECT and nutrient drink test), previous studies have found that obese subjects may have a greater gastric capacity.6 Our findings are consistent with such studies suggesting that satiation and gastric capacity in obese patients correlate with a higher BMI. However, the causality of this observation requires further investigation.

The maximum ingested volume of a liquid depends on a balance between mechanisms that increase gastric volume (accommodation reflex) and the negative feedback that slows gastric emptying and induces satiety after a meal.9 The gastric accommodation reflex is elicited both by distension of the stomach and by nutrients in the duodenum. Because water is a non-nutrient stimulus, the WLT primarily tests sensitivity and accommodation to gastric distension and not nutrient-induced alterations (e.g. Nutridrink or other meal tests).10 One mechanism that could induce satiation and fullness during the WLT is the activation of vago-vagal reflexes resulting in proximal gastric relaxation in response to gastroduodenal distension which in turn stimulates gastric stretch receptors that induce vagal discharges and activates hypothalamic neurons.8

Although the WLT has been used to measure gastric sensation and accommodation, we are unable to exclude the possibility that the observed differences in gastric capacity may simply reflect an accelerated gastric emptying in obese subjects. In fact, it has been reported that obese subjects may have an accelerated gastric emptying as a consequence of a rapid intragastric meal distribution to the antrum and, hence, do not require a large proximal portion of stomach to accommodate a meal.8,10

In conclusion, we have confirmed that obese patients have increased gastric capacity, as measured by the WLT. Our findings suggest that obese patients have an increased gastric accommodation and a faster gastric emptying or lower satiety thresholds in response to liquid ingestion. These mechanisms may play a key role in developing or maintaining higher food consumption in obesity. Additional studies are needed to clarify the cause-effect between gastrointestinal symptoms and BMI in obese subjects.


Correspondence:
Dr. José María Remes-Troche.
Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana. Veracruz, México.
Phone number: + (52) 229 2021230.
E-mails:
jose.remes.troche@gmail.com, joremes@uv.mx

Fecha de recibido: 17 febrero 2009
* Fecha aprobado: 4 marzo 2009

Bibliografía

1.Klein S, Wadden T, Sugerman HJ. AGA technical review on obesity. Gastroenterology 2002;123:882-932.
2.Maes HH, Neale MC, Eaves LJ. Genetic and environmental factors in relative body weight and human adiposity. Behav Genet 1997;27:325-51.
3.Park MI, Camilleri M. Gastric motor and sensory functions in obesity. Obesity Research 2005;13:491-500.
4.Gallagher TK, Geoghegan JG, Baird AW, Winter DC. Implications of altered gastrointestinal motility in obesity. Obes Surg 2007;17:1399-407.
5.Xing J, Chen JD. Alterations of gastrointestinal motility in obesity. Obes Res 2004;12:1723-32.
6.Kim DY, Camilleri M, Murray JA, Stephens DA, Levine JA, Burton DD. Is there a role for gastric accommodation and satiety in asymptomatic obese people? Obesity Research 2001;9:655-61.
7.Wright RA, Krinsky S, Fleeman C, Trujillo J, Teague E. Gastric emptying and obesity. Gastroenterology 1983;84:747-51.
8.Montano-Loza A, Schmulson M, Zepeda-Gomez S, Remes-Troche JM, Valdovinos-Diaz MA. Maximum tolerated volume in drinking tests with water and a nutritional beverage for the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:3122-6.
9.Geliebter A. Gastric distension and gastric capacity in relation to food intake in humans. Physiol Behav 1988;44:665-8.
10.Tack J, Piessevaux H, Coulie B, Caenepeel P, Janssens J. Role of impaired gastric accommodation to a meal in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1998;115:1346-52.