Liver, Pancreas and Biliary TractRadiofrequency ablation plus drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of single large hepatocellular carcinoma
Introduction
Despite the implementation of screening programmes for early diagnosis, about half of the cirrhotic patients still present with single large hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) at diagnosis, and only 30% of them benefit from curative therapies [1], [2], [3], [4]. Resection may provide excellent long-term results in these patients [5]. However, in patients who are not good surgical candidates, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is not a good treatment option as the better results are achieved in tumours up to 3 cm large [6]; furthermore, studies performed on explanted livers obtained from patients treated with RFA before transplantation show that the rate of complete necrosis ranges between 13% and 43% in tumours larger than 3 cm [7]. On the other hand, despite transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the current standard of care for patients with large HCC not amenable to surgery, a sustained complete response (CR) is achieved in only 27–35% of cases [8]. An improvement in TACE technique has been attained after the introduction of drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE): these particles are able to bind and then elute doxorubicin in a predictable manner, thus allowing a more standardized approach and less drug-related toxicity [9]. However, even though DEB-TACE induces extensive tumour necrosis in more than 70% of tumours, less than 20% of the patients achieve a CR [10], [11], [12]. The main goal of the research in this field should be to increase the number of patients with single HCC larger than 3 cm suitable for non-surgical curative treatment; for these patients, a reasonable approach is to combine therapies with possible synergistic effects. Recent studies show that combined therapy with RFA and TACE could be more effective than TACE or RFA alone in local disease control and survival improvement, but it is not clear how the lesion's size affects the follow-up response [13], [14], [15].
Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the single-step combined therapy with RFA and DEB-TACE in single HCC ≥3 cm. The secondary aim was to compare the results with those obtained in a matched population treated with DEB-TACE alone.
Section snippets
Study design/study population
A prospective single-centre pilot study was carried out to test a new single-step combined therapy of HCC with RFA of the lesion followed by selective DEB-TACE. Requirements for inclusion were: (a) single HCC larger than 3 cm; (b) liver cirrhosis classified as Child–Pugh score A5–6 or B7; (c) no vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases; (d) no previous treatment of HCC. The exclusion criteria were: (a) Child–Pugh score B ≥8 or class C; (b) platelet count <40,000/μL and/or international
Study population
Between November 2010 and June 2012, 40 consecutive cirrhotic patients with single HCC larger than 3 cm were enrolled. The main features of patients and tumours are reported in Table 1. Mean HCC diameter was 4.7 ± 1.1 cm (range 3.2–7.5 cm); according to the HCC size, the patients were further divided in Group A (23 patients with HCC ≤5 cm, mean diameter 3.9 ± 0.5 cm, range 3.2–5.0 cm) and Group B (17 patients with HCC >5.0 cm, mean diameter 5.7 ± 0.7 cm, range 5.2–7.5 cm). Besides tumour size, no significant
Discussion
A few recent studies suggest that combined therapy with RFA and TACE could be superior to TACE or RFA alone in the treatment of large HCC [13], [14], [15]. Balloon occlusion of the tumour arterial supply increases the area of coagulation necrosis obtained with RFA by reducing arterial blood flow and minimizing heat loss [19], [20]. On the other hand, by performing TACE after RFA it is possible to obtain some sustained anticancer effect from the sublethal heating created by RFA in the area
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References (24)
- et al.
The changing scenario of hepatocellular carcinoma over the last two decades in Italy
Journal of Hepatology
(2012) - et al.
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
“Survival benefit”: the final destination, with still a long way to go
Digestive and Liver Disease
(2010) - et al.
Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatology
(2002) - et al.
Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival
Hepatology
(2003) - et al.
Survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) using drug eluting beads. Implications for clinical practice and trial design
Journal of Hepatology
(2012) - et al.
Radiofrequency ablation combined with chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5 cm
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
(2009) - et al.
Relative thermosensitivity of cytotoxic drugs used in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
(2004) - et al.
EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Journal of Hepatology
(2012) - et al.
A snapshot of the effective indications and results of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in tertiary referral centers: is it adherent to the EASL/AASLD recommendations? An observational study of the HCC East-West Study Group
Annals of Surgery
(2013)