ReviewDairy products and physical stature: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials
Highlights
► This study assesses whether published studies investigating the relationship between dairy products supplementation and physical growth of children from the age of 2 years and adolescents show consistent positive results. ► Random effects meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis showed that the supplementation effect is about 0.4 cm additional growth per annum and per ca 245 ml milk daily. ► This effect size is larger when baseline height-for-age is lower and when children approach their pubertal growth spurt.
Introduction
Dairy products play an important role in explaining historical trends or regional differences in height. One example is the so-called antebellum puzzle in early-nineteenth century United States of America (Komlos, 1987, Komlos et al., 1992, Zehetmayer, 2011). An other example is the study of regional height differences in nineteenth century Bavaria, Prussia and France (Baten, 2009). Perhaps milk consumption also played a role in more recent height trends. Dutch boys for instance who were born in the late seventies of the 20th century are 5.6 cm taller than their peers born in the USA, whereas Dutch soldiers born about 1900 were 2 cm smaller than native-born American recruits.1
According to the economic historians Komlos and Baten proteins are responsible for the growth stimulating effect of dairy products. However, to date it is not clear which components in milk could be responsible for a possible growth-stimulating effect. According to Hoppe et al. (2006, pp. 153–155) “potential candidates are bioactive peptides, amino acids, cow's milk IGF-I (hdb: insulin-like growth factor), or milk minerals, including calcium”. These bioactive peptides can be found in both casein and whey. The amino acids leucine, isoleucine, and valine may have a particular stimulating effect on insulin secretion.2 Also calcium or zinc could play a role in stimulating growth since both minerals have impact on proportions and density of bones.
Associations between the intake of dairy products and linear growth found in historical research are usually based on non-experimental methods. Such associations might not be causal relationships for it cannot be excluded that other (unknown) factors associated with the intake of dairy products independently influence linear growth. Especially ecological studies, studies at group or population level, are prone to bias (the so-called ecological fallacy) because relationships observed for groups do not necessarily hold for individuals. Only in experimental studies, especially in randomised controlled trials, there is the possibility to control for unknown factors. By randomly allocating persons to an intervention and a control group, groups are comparable as regards known and unknown factors that might influence the outcome of an intervention.
Hoppe et al. (2006, p. 146) reviewed the literature on cow's milk and linear growth and concluded that “overall, published results on the association between cow's milk intake and height strongly suggest that the intake of cow's milk has a stimulating effect on linear growth, although not all studies showed an effect. …It appears that cow's milk may have the strongest effects in children with existing undernutrition …”. The review of Hoppe et al. (2006) was not systematic in that the authors did not conduct a systematic literature search and did not assess the validity of study findings or the methodological quality of the included studies. So, there are reasons for conducting a systematic review. Our review question is: do dairy products supplementation trials in children or adolescents consistently show extra linear growth compared to the growth effect of usual diet?3
Section snippets
Criteria for considering studies for this review
Both randomised and non-randomised controlled trials on children and adolescents (aged 2–18 years) were included in this review. Trials also studying very low birth weight infants, subjects with a history of diseases that negatively influenced physical growth, and overweight or obese subjects were excluded. To be included trials should evaluate the effect of supplementation of usual diet with dairy products on linear growth. Only trials reporting height, change in body height, height
Results
This review and meta-analysis included 12 trials: 7 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 non-randomised controlled trials (CTs).15
Discussion
Both design and execution of most studies had serious limitations and were lower quality trials. Meta-analysis with a random effects model yielded a pooled estimate of 0.59 cm. This additional growth was the result of giving a daily milk supplement of ca 245 ml during 12 months on average. Meta-regression results suggested that the level of nutritional deprivation as indicated by height-for-age z-score, type of dairy product (milk versus other dairy product) and whether children were close to or
References (46)
Protein supply and nutritional status in nineteenth century Bavaria, Prussia and France
Economics and Human Biology
(2009)- et al.
Effects of dairy products on bone and body composition in pubertal girls
The Journal of Pediatrics
(1995) - et al.
Food supplements have a positive impact on weight gain and the addition of animal source foods increases lean body mass of Kenyan schoolchildren
The Journal of Nutrition
(2003) - et al.
Milk consumption and the growth of school-children: second preliminary report on tests to the Scottish board of health
The Lancet
(1929) - et al.
Interrelationships between dietary protein, immunoglobulin levels, humoral immune responses and growth in New Guinean schoolchildren
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(1974) - et al.
The comparative composition of human milk and of cow's milk
The Journal of Biological Chemistry
(1913) - et al.
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
The Lancet
(1998) Evaluation of milk and nutrient intakes of school children in Nigeria
Appetite
(1984)Milk consumption and the growth of school-children: Preliminary Report on Tests to the Scottish Board of Health
The Lancet
(1928)- et al.
A new proposed guidance system for beverage consumption in the United States
The American journal of clinical nutrition
(2006)