In vitro activity of rifaximin against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and other enteropathogenic bacteria isolated from travellers returning to the UK

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.026Get rights and content

Abstract

Rifaximin is licensed in the EU and USA for treating travellers’ diarrhoea caused by non-invasive bacteria. Selection for resistance mechanisms of public health significance might occur if these are linked to rifamycin resistance. Rifaximin MICs were determined by agar dilution for 90 isolates each of Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica, typhoidal S. enterica and Campylobacter spp., an additional 60 E. coli with CTX-M ESBLs isolated from patients with travellers’ diarrhoea, and 30 non-diarrhoeal carbapenemase-producing E. coli. Comparators were rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and doxycycline. Isolates with rifaximin MICs>32 mg/L were screened for arr genes, and critical rpoB regions were sequenced. Rifaximin was active at ≤32 mg/L against 436/450 (96.9%) diverse Enterobacteriaceae, whereas 81/90 (90%) Campylobacter spp. were resistant to rifaximin at ≥128 mg/L. Rifaximin MICs were ≥128 mg/L for two Shigella and five MDR E. coli producing NDM (n = 3), OXA-48 (n = 1) or CTX-M-15 (n = 1). Two of the five MDR E. coli had plasmids harbouring arr-2 together with blaNDM, and two (one each with blaNDM and blaCTX-M-15) had His526Asn substitutions in RpoB. The rifamycin resistance mechanism remained undefined in one MDR E. coli isolate (with blaOXA-48) and the two Shigella isolates. Rifaximin showed good in vitro activity against diverse Enterobacteriaceae but was largely inactive against Campylobacter spp. Rifaximin has potential to co-select MDR E. coli in the gut flora, but much stronger associations were seen between ESBL and/or carbapenemase production and resistance to alternative treatments for travellers’ diarrhoea, notably ciprofloxacin and azithromycin.

Introduction

Diarrhoea is the most common illness reported in international travellers, with bacterial pathogens (including enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter spp. and Shigella spp.) responsible for most cases. Although travellers’ diarrhoea is usually self-limiting, ciprofloxacin or azithromycin may be used to reduce the duration and severity. In contrast to these two agents, rifaximin, a semisynthetic rifamycin licensed for the treatment of travellers’ diarrhoea caused by non-invasive bacterial pathogens in the EU and USA, has minimal absorption from the gut (<1% of oral dose) and offers an alternative with fewer systemic effects [1]. Nevertheless, travel is also a risk factor for colonisation or infection by strains of E. coli with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases [1]. If these organisms are rifaximin-resistant there is a theoretical potential for rifaximin to select for them in the gut flora.

Rifamycins inhibit RNA synthesis by binding to the β-subunit of DNA-dependent mRNA polymerase. Resistance can entail target modification arising from mutations within four highly conserved regions of rpoB, the chromosomal gene that encodes the β-subunit of the mRNA polymerase [2], [3]. Alternatively, resistance can arise via acquisition of plasmid-mediated arr genes, which encode ADP-ribosyltransferases that inactivate rifamycins [4]. As a third mechanism, reduced cellular accumulation owing to efflux can also underlie rifamycin resistance [3].

Studies to date on the rifaximin susceptibility of enteropathogens from travellers’ diarrhoea have focused on US travellers whose travel patterns tend to differ from their UK counterparts, with more travel to Latin America and less to South Asia. Little is known about the rifaximin susceptibility of enteropathogens from UK travellers, and rifamycins are not routinely tested against these organisms.

Against this background, the in vitro activity of rifaximin and comparator agents was assessed against 450 enteropathogens isolated from travellers returning to the UK as well as against 90 clinical multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates of E. coli that produced ESBLs and/or carbapenemases. Acquired resistance mechanisms were sought in isolates with high rifaximin and/or rifampicin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).

Section snippets

Bacterial isolates

In total, 450 test isolates were selected arbitrarily based on patient history of foreign travel among reference submissions sent between 2004 and 2011 to Public Health England's (PHE) Gastrointestinal Bacteria Reference Unit (London, UK). These comprised 90 isolates each of E. coli, Shigella spp., nontyphoidal S. enterica, typhoidal S. enterica and Campylobacter spp. (23 Campylobacter coli and 67 Campylobacter jejuni). The most frequent travel destination reported was South Asia (200

Susceptibility to rifamycins

The MIC of both rifamycins for E. coli ATCC 25922 was 16 mg/L. Amongst the panel of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from travellers returning to the UK with diarrhoea, the rifaximin MICs were unimodal, with peaks at between 4 mg/L and 32 mg/L according to the species group (highest for typhoidal salmonellae and lowest for non-typhoidal salmonellae; Table 2); MIC distributions of rifampicin for these groups similarly clustered from 8 to 32 mg/L. Similarly, the MIC distributions of both rifaximin and

Discussion

Diarrhoea is the most common illness reported in international travellers, particularly those to low-income countries. High levels of resistance are seen to the antibiotics traditionally used to treat travellers’ diarrhoea, principally doxycycline and co-trimoxazole, with increasing resistance to the current first-line agents (azithromycin and ciprofloxacin) among enteropathogens isolated from travellers returning to Spain and the USA [11], [12].

Studies to date indicate that rifaximin has good

Funding

This work was supported by Norgine Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Competing interests

KLH and SM have received conference support from Norgine Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; KLH, DML and NW have received speakers’ or advisory board honoraria from Norgine Pharmaceuticals; DML consults for numerous pharmaceutical and diagnostic companies, including Meiji Seika, Achaogen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Basilea, bioMérieux, Cubist, Discuva, GSK, Kalidex, Merck, Pfizer, Roche and Tetraphase, holds grants from Basilea, Cubist, Meiji Seika and Merck, has received lecture honoraria or travel

Ethical approval

Not required.

References (23)

  • A. Tupin et al.

    Resistance to rifampicin: at the crossroads between ecological, genomic and medical concerns

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2010)
  • R. Steffen et al.

    Therapy of travelers’ diarrhea with rifaximin on various continents

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2003)
  • A.K. van der Bij et al.

    The role of international travel in the worldwide spread of multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (2012)
  • M.J. Pons et al.

    Fitness and molecular mechanisms of resistance to rifaximin in in vitro selected Escherichia coli mutants

    Microb Drug Resist

    (2012)
  • J. Baysarowich et al.

    Rifamycin antibiotic resistance by ADP-ribosylation: structure and diversity of Arr

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2008)
  • H. Dhanji et al.

    Variation in the genetic environments of blaCTX-M-15 in Escherichia coli from the faeces of travellers returning to the United Kingdom

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (2011)
  • Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

    Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard. Document M07-A9

    (2012)
  • Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

    Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-third informational supplement. Document M100-S23

    (2013)
  • S. Mushtaq et al.

    Phylogenetic diversity of Escherichia coli strains producing NDM-type carbapenemases

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (2011)
  • N. Woodford et al.

    for rapid detection of genes encoding CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (2006)
  • F.J. Pérez-Pérez et al.

    Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR

    J Clin Microbiol

    (2002)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Antibiotic susceptibility among non-clinical Escherichia coli as a marker of antibiotic pressure in Peru (2009–2019): one health approach

      2022, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      The high number of isolates exhibiting intermediate resistance levels to a series of unrelated antibiotics might be related to the presence of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations favoring the selection of non-specific low-level resistance mechanisms, such as overexpression of efflux pumps or other adaptative responses, or to external factors, such as the presence of environmental contaminants (e.g: heavy metals, chemicals, solvents), which might favor similar scenarios [107, 108, 109]. In this sense, a study analyzing the mechanisms of rifaximin resistance in 74 commensal and 136 diarrheogenic isolates from a periurban area of Lima showed an unusual scenario, with 100% of the isolates having a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥32 mg/L [75], when studies on E. coli with a very diverse geographical origin only showed the presence of a few E. coli isolates presenting a maximum MIC of ≥32 mg/L [40, 110, 111, 112]. This atypical resistance pattern was related to the presence of overexpressed efflux pumps in 95.2% of the isolates, with only 9 out of 200 (4.5%) isolates having MICs ≥32 mg/L after the use of an efflux pump inhibitor [75].

    • Doxycycline as an antimalarial: Impact on travellers’ diarrhoea and doxycycline resistance among various stool bacteria – Prospective study and literature review

      2022, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      EUCAST has not established the breakpoint MICs for doxycycline. We selected >4, since it is used by CLSI [16] and several other studies [29,36,48,69]. Had we applied ≥16 as a breakpoint MIC value, the co-resistance rate would have been 83.3% (75/90), yielding the co-resistance rates of 90.9% for doxycycline users (10/11) and 82.3% for non-users (65/70).

    • Bacterial travellers’ diarrhoea: A narrative review of literature published over the past 10 years

      2022, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the case of EAEC and ETEC, rates of resistance to rifaximin appear to be lower than those observed for other antibiotics and there is no indication that rifaximin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) increase among recovered isolates [7,108], although data on resistance rates are limited [7]. Furthermore, rifaximin should not be used to treat Campylobacter-associated TD due to its high level of resistance and evidence of clinical failure [116,122,159] and is unsuitable for the treatment of invasive disease [7]. Since the aetiology of TD remains undetermined in 40–50% of cases [160], physicians should exercise caution when prescribing rifaximin in regions where Campylobacter or invasive pathogens are prevalent.

    • Natural plant products inhibits growth and alters the swarming motility, biofilm formation, and expression of virulence genes in enteroaggregative and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

      2016, Food Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The results of this study showed that citral also showed antimicrobial activity against pathogenic E. coli strains. The potent activity of rifaximin against all E. coli strains was reported by Hopkins et al. (2014), and confirmed in this study. Almost all of the treatments reduced swarming motility of the E. coli strains; however, and contrary to our expectations, carvacrol promoted swarming in EHEC O157:H7 and EAEC 042, but not in EAEC 0104:H4.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    These data were first presented at the 22nd European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), 31 March–2 April 2012, London, UK [abstracts P1829 and P1293].

    View full text