Elsevier

Journal of Hepatology

Volume 45, Issue 2, August 2006, Pages 230-235
Journal of Hepatology

Liver stiffness measurement selects patients with cirrhosis at risk of bearing large oesophageal varices

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2006.04.006Get rights and content

Background/Aims

Periodic endoscopic screening for oesophageal varices is recommended in patients with cirrhosis, but might be limited to a subgroup of patients if a simple non-invasive test was available to select those at risk of bleeding.

Methods

We studied in 165 patients with cirrhosis the relation between the presence of oesophageal varices assessed by endoscopy, and liver stiffness measurement by Fibroscan®, a non-invasive parameter related to liver fibrosis. The results were compared to those of other parameters reflecting portal hypertension, splenic size, platelet count, and platelet count/spleen size ratio.

Results

Liver stiffness measurement was correlated to the grade of oesophageal varices (r = 0.6, p < 0.0001). AUROC values of liver stiffness measurement were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78–0.90) for the presence of oesophageal varices and 0.83 (0.76–0.89) for varices grade  II. Liver stiffness measurement value <19 kPa was highly predictive of the absence of oesophageal varices grade  II (Se: 84%, PPV: 47%, NPV: 93%).

Conclusions

Liver stiffness measurement allows to predict the presence of large oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis, and may help to select patients for endoscopic screening.

Introduction

Mortality in patients with cirrhosis has continuously decreased during the past decades thanks to active prevention of complications mainly gastro-intestinal haemorrhage and bacterial infections [1]. These measures, particularly prevention of digestive haemorrhage from oesophageal varices (OV) which rely on either pharmacological treatments [2], [3], [4] or band ligations [5], are widely considered as effective and may reduce mortality.

The risk of variceal haemorrhage is clearly related to the size of OV [6], [7]. Therefore primary prevention of variceal bleeding applies to patients with previously diagnosed large OV (grade II or III) detected by periodical upper tract endoscopy. Several consensus conferences have stated that this periodical surveillance was justified and that the optimal periodicity for variceal screening was between one and three years [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].

The number of patients eligible for variceal screening depends on the prevalence of cirrhosis in the general population and on putative criteria of selection. If all patients with cirrhosis were concerned, as cirrhosis is more and more screened for, the numbers would be considerable. A generalized program of periodical upper tract endoscopy in these patients might result in heavy economical burden even for developed countries [14]. Furthermore repeated examinations, when not performed under general anaesthesia or profound sedation, are often poorly accepted by patients who may refuse further followup [15]. For these reasons selection of patients with a high probability of bearing OV and especially large OV at risk of rupture has been proposed using various non-invasive criteria [11], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. These putative criteria of selection are either simple but poorly discriminant, or multiple but complex and hardly usable in clinical practice.

There is still a need for a simple reliable parameter that would allow limiting the indications of upper tract endoscopy to a subgroup of patients especially at risk. We propose here a new method for selecting patients for variceal screening. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) relies on the calculation of liver elasticity (or stiffness) from the velocity of a low frequency elastic wave inside the liver [21]. The method is entirely non-invasive and well accepted by patients. It is correlated to the extent of fibrosis and is particularly reliable for the diagnosis of cirrhosis [22].

Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the value of LSM for selecting patients with cirrhosis at risk of bearing large OV and therefore eligible for upper tract endoscopy screening and to compare this new parameter to other previously proposed criteria of selection.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

We studied 175 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who had been submitted to a first upper tract endoscopy for variceal screening between November 2002 and June 2004, and who responded to the following criteria: (a) histologically proven cirrhosis; (b) absence of previous or current decompensation (patients with ascites even detected by ultrasonography examination were not included); (c) absence of previous digestive tract haemorrhage.

All patients included in this study were participants in a

Results

Among 175 patients responding to the criteria of inclusion, 10 patients (6%) had either unsuccessful LSM, or did not have 10 validated measures with a 60% success rate. These cases were considered as failure of the method – the main cause being obesity – and subsequently excluded from the study (data not shown).

Among the 165 remaining patients (mean age 56 years, 111 men), the cause of cirrhosis was HCV in 98 patients, alcohol in 37 patients, hepatitis B in 17 patients, haemochromatosis in 5

Discussion

Our study strongly suggests that LSM, a simple non-invasive physical parameter, is able to identify among patients with well-compensated cirrhosis a large group ineligible for variceal screening as having a low probability of bearing varices and particularly large varices. Cirrhosis is clearly not a homogeneous condition and it is still difficult to classify patients according to the severity of their disease. LSM could provide useful indirect indication in that setting. LSM, if becoming a

References (32)

  • N. Carbonell et al.

    Improved survival after variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis over the past two decades

    Hepatology

    (2004)
  • T. Poynard et al.

    Beta-adrenergic-antagonist drugs in the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices. An analysis of data and prognostic factors in 589 patients from four randomized clinical trials. Franco-Italian Multicenter Study Group

    N Engl J Med

    (1991)
  • L. Pagliaro et al.

    Prevention of first bleeding in cirrhosis. A meta-analysis of randomized trials of nonsurgical treatment

    Ann Intern Med

    (1992)
  • Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A...
  • G. D’Amico et al.

    Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach

    Semin Liver Dis

    (1999)
  • R. De Franchis

    Treatment of bleeding oesophageal varices: a meta-analysis

    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl

    (1994)
  • Cited by (326)

    • Transient elastography and platelet count as noninvasive predictors of gastroesophageal varices in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus–related liver cirrhosis

      2023, Medical Journal Armed Forces India
      Citation Excerpt :

      The sensitivity of LSM for prediction of EV was high (94%) but with a low specificity (81%). Previously, LSM has high sensitivity (76%–95%) for the prediction of EV but with a lower specificity (43%–78%).16,17 Our results agreed with a study carried out in Egypt in which they evaluated 32 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis to assess the ability of FibroScan to predict the presence and grade of EV.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors who have taken part in the research of this paper have no relationship with the manufacturers of the drug involved either in the past or present. The authors state that they did not receive funding from the manufacturers to carry out their research. The authors did not receive funding from any source to carry out this study.

    View full text