Management of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Children

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2009.11.007Get rights and content

Section snippets

Diagnosis and classification of acute GVHD

Historically, GVHD was categorized as acute or chronic based on time of presentation; GVHD before day 100 was known as acute, and after day 100 it was known as chronic. This classification was based on patients transplanted with HLA-identical sibling bone marrow (BM) after receiving myeloablative conditioning. In the last 20 years, HSCT has become more complex, particularly with the use of different stem cell sources (reviewed by Peters and colleagues elsewhere in this issue), and the

Primary (initial) treatment of aGVHD

Patients with aGVHD have traditionally continued on GVHD prophylaxis, most commonly a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), and in some cases the CNI is combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus. Additional therapy depends on the initial grade of aGVHD, the particular organs involved, and is discussed later.

Modification of the Starting Dose of MP for Patients with Grade II aGVHD

An important goal of therapy is to minimize complications associated with high-dose glucocorticoid therapy. Therefore, some centers have attempted to begin treatment with MP-equivalent doses less than 2 mg/kg for milder GVHD within the spectrum of aGVHD manifestations that warrant systemic therapy as shown by a large retrospective study of 733 patients.21 This approach requires further validation, particularly for patients with grades III to IV aGVHD who were not well represented in this study.

Monitoring of response and tapering glucocorticoids

All patients with aGVHD should be monitored closely. If aGVHD progresses within 3 to 4 days or no improvement is observed after 5 to 7 days of MP treatment then the GVHD is considered to be steroid refractory (SR-GVHD) and second-line therapy is required as discussed later. Progression is defined as worsening GVHD in 1 or more organ with or without amelioration in any organ.

If on the other hand, GVHD symptoms have resolved after 5 to 7 days of MP therapy, it is reasonable to attempt a taper of

Treatment of steroid-resistant acute GVHD and outcomes

Approximately half of patients with aGVHD respond to treatment with steroids as initial therapy, with approximately one-third of patients having a durable response.18, 19, 20, 46 Factors most commonly associated with a favorable response include HLA matching for the GVHD vector, use of related donor grafts, and early onset of GVHD.18 Failure of primary therapy (steroid-resistant [SR-aGVHD]) has been defined operationally as the progression of aGVHD symptoms beyond 3 to 4 days after starting MP.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis and supportive care

AGVHD is by itself profoundly immunosuppressive as are the therapies used to treat it, leading to an extraordinarily high risk for opportunistic infections and sepsis. Breakdown of skin and intestinal epithelia that occurs in more severe aGVHD forms adds to this risk. High-dose prednisone increases the risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation.41 Similarly, invasive aspergillosis occurs more frequently in patients who develop CMV disease and in patients receiving higher doses of prednisone.43

Summary

AGVHD remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic HSCT in children. Currently, first-line aGVHD therapy relies on glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of inflammation and donor T cell alloreactivity, usually in combination with 1 or more of the agents chosen for aGVHD prophylaxis. Newer approaches are needed to improve the overall 50% or less durable response rates that have been achieved with systemic glucocorticoids. Because promising agents in small single-center studies

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant no. CA18029 from the National Institutes of Health.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (78)

  • M.T. van Lint et al.

    Early treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease with high- or low-dose 6-methylprednisolone: a multicenter randomized trial from the Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation

    Blood

    (1998)
  • L. Cragg et al.

    A randomized trial comparing prednisone with antithymocyte globulin/prednisone as an initial systemic therapy for moderately severe acute graft-versus-host disease

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2000)
  • S.J. Lee et al.

    Effect of up-front daclizumab when combined with steroids for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: results of a randomized trial

    Blood

    (2004)
  • J.E. Levine et al.

    Etanercept plus methylprednisolone as initial therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease

    Blood

    (2008)
  • A.M. Alousi et al.

    Etanercept, mycophenolate, denileukin, or pentostatin plus corticosteroids for acute graft-versus-host disease: a randomized phase 2 trial from the blood and marrow transplant clinical trials network

    Blood

    (2009)
  • P.J. Martin et al.

    A retrospective analysis of therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease: initial treatment

    Blood

    (1990)
  • D.J. Weisdorf et al.

    Acute upper gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: clinical significance and response to immunosuppressive therapy

    Blood

    (1990)
  • M.L. MacMillan et al.

    Response of 443 patients to steroids as primary therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease: comparison of grading systems

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2002)
  • M. Mielcarek et al.

    Initial therapy of acute graft-versus-host disease with low-dose prednisone does not compromise patient outcomes

    Blood

    (2009)
  • M.T. van Lint et al.

    Treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease with prednisolone: significant survival advantage for day +5 responders and no advantage for nonresponders receiving anti-thymocyte globulin

    Blood

    (2006)
  • J.H. Antin et al.

    Novel approaches to the therapy of steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2004)
  • P. Kebriaei et al.

    Adult human mesenchymal stem cells added to corticosteroid therapy for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2009)
  • W.G. Nichols et al.

    Rising pp65 antigenemia during preemptive anticytomegalovirus therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, correlation with DNA load, and outcomes

    Blood

    (2001)
  • M. Hakki et al.

    Immune reconstitution to cytomegalovirus after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: impact of host factors, drug therapy, and subclinical reactivation

    Blood

    (2003)
  • K.A. Marr et al.

    Invasive aspergillosis in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: changes in epidemiology and risk factors

    Blood

    (2002)
  • T. Fukuda et al.

    Risks and outcomes of invasive fungal infections in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants after nonmyeloablative conditioning

    Blood

    (2003)
  • S.J. Lee et al.

    Chronic graft-versus-host disease

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2003)
  • D. Weisdorf et al.

    Treatment of moderate/severe acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: an analysis of clinical risk features and outcome

    Blood

    (1990)
  • D. Przepiorka et al.

    Daclizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain antibody, for treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease

    Blood

    (2000)
  • V.T. Ho et al.

    Safety and efficacy of denileukin diftitox in patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    Blood

    (2004)
  • D.R. Couriel et al.

    Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after ablative and nonmyeloablative conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2004)
  • P.A. Carpenter et al.

    A phase II multicenter study of visilizumab, humanized anti-CD3 antibody, to treat steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2005)
  • M.L. MacMillan et al.

    Early antithymocyte globulin therapy improves survival in patients with steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2002)
  • S.M. Arai

    Poor outcome in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease with antithymocyte globulin treatment

    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

    (2002)
  • H.T. Greinix et al.

    Extracorporeal photochemotherapy in the treatment of severe steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a pilot study

    Blood

    (2000)
  • N. Basara et al.

    Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD in bone marrow transplant recipient

    Transplant Proc

    (1998)
  • N. Basara et al.

    Mycophenolate Mofetil in the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: four years of experience

    Transplant Proc

    (2001)
  • K. Le Blanc et al.

    Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • K. Le Blanc et al.

    Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Is Safe and Well Tolerated following Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

      2022, Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      ANC recovery was a criterion for discharge from the HSCT unit according to the standard of care. Data were collected on the severity and nature of adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 [CTCAE 4.03]), engraftment, acute GVHD (aGVHD), chimerism, and outcomes until day +100 [21]. Between January 2004 and December 2019, a total of 62 SCD patients underwent HSCT at 12 centers.

    • Prevention and Treatment of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

      2020, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
      Citation Excerpt :

      While clinical trials are increasingly being conducted to test new approaches based on recent advances in GVHD biology, there remains a need for greater inclusion of pediatric patients to advance novel strategies for acute GVHD. Nearly all published studies on GVHD management focus on adults [3], with assumptions of efficacy extrapolated to pediatric patients without evidence-based data or pediatric pharmacokinetic or dose-finding studies [19]. A search of ClinicalTrials.gov was performed on September 19, 2019.

    • Investigating the self-perceived educational priorities of haematology nurses

      2019, European Journal of Oncology Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      One example being GvHD - a cause of significant morbidity and mortality post allogeneic SCT in children. Identification of this topic as an educational priority for respondents working with paediatric and AYA patients may also reflect the diversity of strategies in GvHD management as optimal therapies are not yet established (Carpenter and MacMillan, 2010). Given the increasing number of survivors, it is not surprising that one of the top 5 educational priorities was that of long-term side effects.

    • Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Children and Adolescents with Fanconi Anemia

      2017, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
      Citation Excerpt :

      To circumvent this, we have instituted administration of methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) for 2 weeks with the earliest sign of neutrophil recovery with the intent to dampen inflammatory response. GVHD is an important determinant of morbidity and mortality after transplantation for nonmalignant diseases [32]. We used 50 mg/kg of PT-CY for FA to reduce exposure to an alkylating agent [9] and have shown previously that 60 mg/kg of CY is well tolerated in FA [33].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by Grant No. CA18029 from the National Institutes of Health.

    View full text