Original ContributionValidation of Shear Wave Elastography Cutoff Values on the Supersonic Aixplorer for Practical Clinical Use in Liver Fibrosis Staging
Introduction
Hepatitis C viral disease (HCV), hepatitis B viral disease (HBV), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) are forms of chronic liver disease (CLD) that share a common pathway of progressive liver fibrosis, which may ultimately culminate in cirrhosis (Sebastiani et al. 2011). Management of these various forms of CLD is centered on attempts to reverse early fibrosis and prevent progression to cirrhosis. Although non-focal liver biopsy is currently the reference standard for fibrosis staging in patients with known liver disease, it is invasive and expensive, and is limited by inter-observer variability and sampling error (Regev et al. 2002).
Various imaging techniques including morphologic analysis, CT-perfusion analysis (Ronot et al. 2010), MR-perfusion analysis (Hagiwara et al. 2008), water diffusion imaging (Bonekamp et al., 2011, Wang et al., 2012) and elastography have been shown to predict liver fibrosis stage with varying degrees of accuracy. As a non-invasive, inexpensive and portable technique, ultrasound (US) elastography has shown promising results (Chon et al., 2012, Friedrich-Rust et al., 2008, Friedrich-Rust et al., 2012). In particular, shear wave elastography (SWE) derived estimates of shear wave speed and hepatic Young's modulus, measured in kilopascal (kPa) have been shown to be related to liver fibrosis stage (Beland et al., 2014a, Deffieux et al., 2015, Feng et al., 2016, Jeong et al., 2014, Sporea et al., 2014a, Tada et al., 2015, Zheng et al., 2015). Cut-off eYM or shear wave speed values for different liver fibrosis stages have been proposed in a number of studies (Beland et al., 2014a, Jeong et al., 2014, Samir et al., 2015). A recent meta-analysis of SWE studies summarizes this dilemma wherein 12 manuscripts reviewed have generated 12 different cut-off values for variable sensitivities and specificities (Feng et al. 2016). To date, these cut-off values have not been prospectively validated in data sets independent of those used to generate the cut-off values, making it extremely difficult for clinicians to decide on which set of values to base a clinical decision. A recent editorial by experts in the field has also pointed out these challenges from a clinical standpoint (Piscaglia et al. 2016).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of our previously established eYM cut-off values for staging liver fibrosis (Samir et al. 2015) in an independent cohort of patients with diffuse liver disease.
Section snippets
Design overview and study population
This prospective single institution study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Patients with known or suspected diffuse liver disease scheduled for US-guided non-focal liver biopsy between January 2014 and January 2015 underwent SWE. Patients younger than 18 y were excluded. The institutional review board waived the requirement for informed consent as SWE examination is approved by the US Food and Drug
Results
A total of 338 patients underwent SWE acquisitions between January 2014 and January 2015, just before non-focal liver biopsy. A total of 61 patients were excluded from the study group per the exclusion criteria—29 with allografts, 1 with granulomatous hepatitis, 1 with amyloidosis and 30 in whom elastograms were of poor quality (n = 25) or inadequate number (n = 5). A total of 277 patients remained (Fig. 2). These 152 (54.9%) women and 125 (45.1%) men had a mean age of 48 ± 13.48 y (range:
Discussion
SWE of the liver offers exciting potential for non-invasively differentiating patients with advanced liver fibrosis (F2–F4) from those with no or early fibrosis (F0, F1). This distinction is of critical clinical importance because advanced fibrosis at the time of diagnosis has been shown to correlate with long-term cirrhosis risk in patients with HCV and HBV (Di Bisceglie, 1995, Kato et al., 1994, Park et al., 2007, Takano et al., 1995, Yamada et al., 1995).
Earlier SWE studies have proposed
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the NIBIB of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers HHSN268201300071 C and K23 EB020710. The authors are solely responsible for the content and the work does not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
References (29)
- et al.
An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group
Hepatology
(1996) - et al.
Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with impulse elastography: comparison of Supersonic Shear Imaging with ARFI and FibroScan®
J Hepatol
(2014) - et al.
Investigating liver stiffness and viscosity for fibrosis, steatosis and activity staging using shear wave elastography
J Hepatol
(2015) - et al.
Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: A meta-analysis
Gastroenterol
(2008) - et al.
Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection
Am J Gastroenterol
(2002) - et al.
Acoustic radiation force impulse and supersonic shear imaging versus transient elastography for liver fibrosis assessment
Ultrasound Med Biol
(2013) - et al.
Which are the cut-off values of 2 D-shear wave elastography (2 D-SWE) liver stiffness measurements predicting different stages of liver fibrosis, considering transient elastography (TE) as the reference method?
Eur J Radiol
(2014) - et al.
Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B and C: A prospective study of 251 patients
Hepatology
(1995) - et al.
A pilot study estimating liver fibrosis with ultrasound shear-wave elastography: Does the cause of liver disease or location of measurement affect performance?
Am J Roentgenol
(2014) - et al.
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis
J Clin Gastroenterol
(2011)
Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis
PLoS One
Hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma
Semin Liver Dis
Diagnostic accuracy of SuperSonic shear imaging for staging of liver fibrosis: A meta-analysis
J Ultrasound Med
Liver Fibrosis Study Group, Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study
Hepatology
Cited by (24)
Age-related changes in muscle elasticity around the shoulder joint in young male baseball players: A prospective longitudinal study
2020, Journal of Orthopaedic ScienceCitation Excerpt :For quantitative analysis, the SEM, which is the ratio between the SR in the acoustic coupler and the SR of each muscle (muscle/coupler), was calculated as a representative value. Smaller SEM values indicate greater elasticity, and larger SEM values indicate greater inflexibility [8–10]. Minor pressure applied with the probe was confirmed on the strain graph on the ultrasound imaging system.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Shear Wave Elastography as a Non-invasive Biomarker of High-Risk Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis in Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
2020, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyCitation Excerpt :To mitigate measurement variability, we collected 10 measurements from each patient and used the median value for data analysis. This technique has been reported in previous studies and is used in routine clinical care (Zhao et al. 2014; Dhyani et al. 2017; Sande et al. 2017). The feasibility and reliability of fewer measurements have been suggested, although additional study is required to further justify reduced numbers of measurements (Sporea et al. 2013).
Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography: Variations of Liver Fibrosis Assessment as a Function of Depth, Force and Distance from Central Axis of the Transducer with a Comparison of Different Systems
2018, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyCitation Excerpt :As a result, alternative non-invasive staging methods have been proposed including blood tests (Chin et al. 2016; Rosenberg et al. 2004), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) (Dulai et al. 2016; Petitclerc et al. 2017) and ultrasound elastography (UE) (Crespo et al. 2012; Dhyani et al. 2015; Sigrist et al. 2017). UE approaches that employ acoustic or mechanical force to generate tissue shear waves have been reported to correlate with liver fibrosis stage (Dhyani et al. 2017; Ferraioli et al. 2012; Li et al. 2016; Samir et al. 2015). In clinical practice, UE measurements exhibit variability that limits their capability to precisely quantify liver fibrosis.
The Mexican consensus on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
2019, Revista de Gastroenterologia de Mexico