- •
Pancreatic cancer is currently the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States.
- •
Margin negative surgical resection remains a critical component of cure.
- •
Preoperative computed tomography or MRI is essential in determining resectability.
- •
An experienced team is critical when performing complex vascular resections and reconstructions in this patient cohort.
Vascular Resections During the Whipple Procedure
Section snippets
Key points
Significance: brief literature review
In an effort to update the reader concerning recent important contributions to the literature on this topic, this brief literature review is provided.
Because complete macroscopic tumor resection is one of the most important predictors of long-term survival in PDA, the ISGPS recently defined the extent of pancreatectomy in a consensus article by Hartwig and colleagues [4]. In this article, the standard Whipple procedure is defined as removing
- •
Head of the pancreas and the uncinate process
- •
Duodenum
Defining resectability
In general, the ability of both MRI and CT to predict the presence or absence of vessel involvement is roughly equivalent. The authors prefer high-quality, multidetector CT scan using oral water and intravenous (IV) contrast, with work station reconstructions. In head to head comparisons, CT scan may be somewhat inferior to MRI in detecting either liver or peritoneal metastases, although the many studies that have looked at this have had mixed results. As surgeons, we have found it easier to
Summary
Contemplating a Whipple resection with a vascular resection is a major undertaking. The operation should be planned carefully, with intense scrutiny of the preoperative imaging and attention to the various visceral arteries and veins. Access to autologous vascular conduits is crucial, hence prepping the neck and groins should be a component of each case. It is in the patient’s best interest to avoid major vascular injuries, hence the steps of the Whipple operation should be performed to allow
References (22)
- et al.
Genetic diversity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and opportunities for precision medicine
Gastroenterology
(2016) - et al.
Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)
Surgery
(2014) - et al.
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)
Surgery
(2014) - et al.
Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)
Surgery
(2014) - et al.
Significance of portal vein invasion and extent of invasion in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
J Gastrointest Surg
(2016) - et al.
Vein resections >3 cm during pancreatectomy are associated with poor 1-year patency rates
Surgery
(2015) - et al.
A graded evaluation of outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy with major vascular resection in pancreatic cancer
J Gastrointest Surg
(2016) - et al.
Perioperative and long-term outcome after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy, additional portal vein and multivisceral resection for pancreatic head cancer
J Gastrointest Surg
(2015) - et al.
Prosthetic graft for superior mesenteric-portal vein reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective multicenter study
J Gastrointest Surg
(2014) - et al.
Arterial resection at the time of pancreatectomy for cancer
Surgery
(2014)
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: superior mesenteric artery first approach
J Gastrointest Surg
Cited by (0)
The authors have nothing to disclose.