Implementation of tumor testing for lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers at a large academic medical center
Introduction
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant disorder, caused by germ line mutations in the four mismatch repair (MMR) pathway genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, and EPCAM deletion (resulting in MSH2 promoter methylation), which increase the risk of endometrial, colorectal, ovarian, gastric, small bowel, and other cancers. LS confers up to a 60% risk of endometrial cancer and accounts for 2%–6% of all endometrial cancers [1], [2]. Nearly 50% of women with LS and multiple malignancies present with endometrial cancer as their first primary cancer [3]. It is therefore essential to identify endometrial cancer patients with LS to guide medical management and to help reduce the risk of additional cancers for the patient and relatives.
Traditional methods of identifying LS, including the Amsterdam criteria, have proven to be ineffective for endometrial cancer patients, with sensitivity < 40% [1]. Tumor testing with microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR protein expression are more sensitive methods of identifying LS. Over 90% of endometrial cancers caused by LS demonstrate MSI [1]. IHC for the MMR proteins has a sensitivity of approximately 94% and can be used alone or in conjunction with MSI to identify patients who for whom directed germ line testing is indicated [1].
Several large institutions across the United States have implemented universal screening using MSI and/or IHC in colorectal cancers due in part to the recommendation from the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group, stating that all newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients should be offered testing for LS [4]. However, the only guidelines for MSI/IHC screening for LS in endometrial cancer state that testing should be considered for women diagnosed before the age of 50 years [5]. Since most women with LS are diagnosed with endometrial cancer after the age of 50 years and are more likely to be diagnosed with endometrial cancer than with colon cancer, there is a need for a better screening strategy in this population [6]. A few hospitals have begun screening endometrial cancers; however, the best screening criteria and methodology are not well established. Here we report on implementing and evaluating universal screening of endometrial cancers for LS at a large academic medical center.
Section snippets
Patients
MSI/IHC screening was performed for patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus based on provider request (surgeon or genetic counselor [GC]), or automatic screening criteria as outlined below. Cleveland Clinic gynecologic oncologists perform surgeries at Main Campus, as well as two regional hospitals, the latter with pathology departments that do not perform MSI/IHC. Screening criteria and methodology were determined by the Department of Anatomic Pathology
Results
A total of 245 primary endometrial cancers were screened over a period of 43 months. Overall, 62/245 patients (25%) had abnormal MSI and/or IHC results (Fig. 2). Of the 62 patients, 48 (77%) lacked expression of MLH1/PMS2, 5 lacked MSH2/MSH6, 2 lacked MSH6 only, 2 lacked PMS2 only, 2 demonstrated equivocal expression of MSH2 and/or MSH6, 1 was MSI-H with intact protein expression, and 2 lacked expression of MLH1/PMS2/MSH6.
Of the 62 patients, 42 (68%) with abnormal results were referred to
Discussion
It is well established that universal screening for LS is effective and should be offered for all colorectal cancer patients [4]. Screening for colorectal cancers has been performed at the Cleveland Clinic since 2004 and has evolved from screening only patients younger than 50 years to universal screening [10]. Our process of screening in endometrial cancers followed a similar evolution, but on a shortened timeline.
At the time we began, we were unsure if screening all endometrial cancers was
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
C.E. is the Sondra J. and Stephen R. Hardis Chair of Cancer Genomic Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic and is an American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professor, generously funded in part by the F.M. Kirby Foundation.
References (15)
- et al.
Prospective evaluation of molecular screening for Lynch syndrome in patients with endometrial cancer ≤ 70 years
Gynecol Oncol
(2012) - et al.
Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset
Gastroenterology
(2005) - et al.
A two-antibody mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry screening approach for colorectal carcinomas, skin sebaceous tumors, and gynecologic tract carcinomas
Mod Pathol
(2011) - et al.
Immunohistochemistry for PMS2 and MSH6 alone can replace a four antibody panel for mismatch repair deficiency screening in colorectal adenocarcinoma
Pathology
(2010) - et al.
Prospective evaluation of DNA mismatch repair protein expression in primary endometrial cancer
Gynecol Oncol
(2009) - et al.
Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients
Cancer Res
(2006) - et al.
Gynecologic cancer as a “sentinel cancer” for women with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome
Obstet Gynecol
(2005)
Cited by (91)
Comparison of two Lynch screening strategies in endometrial cancer in a California health system
2020, Gynecologic OncologyCitation Excerpt :While we expected higher detection in Southern California with the universal automated IHC strategy than Northern California with a physician ordered risk based IHC strategy, we surprisingly showed that LS detection was 2% in both regions. This LS prevalence is consistent with most published rates, ranging from 2 to 4.6% using the universal IHC screening strategy [18,22,23,25,28]. Our findings are even more notable because a similar result occurred in the group under age 60, despite a shared recommendation to perform IHC in this age group but widely different adoption of the practice.
Universal Testing to Identify Lynch Syndrome Among Women With Newly Diagnosed Endometrial Carcinoma
2020, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSomatic Sequencing and Microsatellite Instability Results From Mismatch Repair-deficient Endometrial Carcinoma Patients Without Lynch Syndrome ("Lynch-like" tumors): Implications for Heritable Cancer Screening, Molecular Prognostication, and Immunotherapeutic Vulnerability
2023, American Journal of Surgical Pathology