In the last few decades, an increase in acute pancreatitis (AP) cases in children and adults has been reported.1 AP affects 1/10,000 children annually, 30% of whom will develop recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP).2 In Mexico, RAP has been estimated at 24-37% in children.3
The majority of guidelines are extrapolated from the adult population, which poses challenges, given that pediatric AP etiology differs substantially from that in adults.1,4
According to the Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis in Children and Adolescents from the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología, etiology varies according to age group and comorbidities and risk factors should be carefully assessed in the clinical approach.3 In the pediatric population, more than one contributing factor is often identified in the development of AP, RAP, and CP. Reported etiologies include genetic, anatomic, obstructive, pharmacotoxic, traumatic, metabolic, systemic, infectious, autoimmune, environmental, and idiopathic causes.2,3,5,6 Of the anatomic causes, pathogenic variants and malformations (pancreas divisum 14%, pancreatic loop 0.5%, annular pancreas < 1%) predispose to recurrent episodes.2 Other anatomical variations may occur at the level of the bile ducts, such as the cholecystohepatic duct, segmental variations of the bile duct, aberrant bile ducts, or ducts of Luschka (subvesicular or supravesicular ducts). Luschka ducts are small ducts originating from the biliary system, typically draining into the right hepatic lobe. There are theories on a congenital etiology, as well as an acquired origin, but there is little information on their pathophysiology, incidence, and prevalence, or their association with AP and RAP. In their study, Handra-Luca et al. reported on 55 cases of adult patients with accessory Luschka ducts, 11 of whom presented with pancreatitis (20%, 6 women, 5 men, 35-86 years of age).7
Given the scarcity of literature available on said association in the pediatric population, we consider the present case relevant, emphasizing the importance of a systematic clinical approach.
A previously healthy 11-year and 7 month-old girl, with no family history of autoimmune disease, eutrophic (weight 35.7 kg, height 149.5 cm, BMI 16 kg/m2, p17.8%, z-score –0.92), presented with a 3-month progression of sharp, non-radiating epigastric pain, accompanied by nausea, but no vomiting, and elevated pancreatic enzymes, consistent with 2 episodes of AP, separated by 3 months. She received symptomatic treatment. The initial ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging studies were unremarkable. The patient was referred to our center for etiologic evaluation (Table 1). She experienced 3 additional episodes of pancreatitis (at one-month intervals), classified as RAP due to clinical and biochemical resolution between episodes. Because of persistent recurrent episodes and the unavailability of genetic testing, endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic biopsy was performed (Table 1). One month later, the patient had a sixth episode of pancreatitis, and for the first time, elevated transaminases (ALT 94.9 U/L, AST 49 U/L). An ultrasound study identified biliary sludge. With suspected biliary etiology, pediatric surgery was consulted to perform cholecystectomy. Intraoperative findings were a short cystic duct crossed by a duct of Luschka. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. The patient had no new episodes of pancreatitis during the 12-month follow-up period.
Diagnostic approach.
| Laboratory studies | Pancreatic enzymes: amylase 1,493 U/L, lipase 1,728 U/L |
| Complete blood count: Hb 12.4 g/dL, Hct 36.1%, Leu 5,520/mm3, Neu 31.0%, Lym 44.2%. Plt 337,000/mm3 | |
| Lipid profile: cholesterol 152, c-HDL 38.7, c-LDL 96, triglycerides 125 mg/dL | |
| Glucose metabolism: 95 mg/dL, HbA1c 4.9% | |
| Serum electrolytes: Na 142, K 3.6 Cl 107 mEq/L, Ca 9.3, Mg 1.73, P 4.6 mg/dL | |
| Kidney function tests: BUN 5 mg/dL, creatinine 0.47 mg/dL | |
| Liver function tests: ALT 94.9 U/L, AST 49 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 258 U/L, TB 0.2 mg/dL (IB 0.1, DB 0.1 mg/dL), albumin 4.7 g/dL, total proteins 7.2 mg/dL, globulins 2.5 g/dL, GGT 12 U/L | |
| Immunoglobulins: IgG 924 mg/dL (639-1349), IgA 210 mg/dL, IgM 145 mg/dL, IgE 406 IU/mL | |
| Autoantibodies: fine speckled anti-nuclear antibody 1+, smooth muscle antibody 1+, dilution 1:80 | |
| Urinalysis: normal glucose, pH 6.5, negative for ketonic bodies | |
| Ammonia: 14.8 µmol/L | |
| Pancreatic tumor marker: CA 19-9: 2.5 U/mL (0-37) | |
| Viral serology: negative for HIV, HBV, CMV, EBV, HSV, rubella | |
| Abdominal ultrasound | Liver with normal shape and position, well-defined, lobulated contours. The right hepatic lobe measures 10.5 cm at its largest axis, there is a diffuse increase in the echogenicity of the parenchyma. No dilation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. Patent portal vein and suprahepatic veins. Gallbladder has normal shape and position, with heterogeneous content due to fluid level, measures 5.4 × 2.5 × 2.5 cm, wall measures 4 mm in diameter, infundibular angulation, and biliary sludge. Choledochus measures 5.4 mm in diameter. Pancreas has normal morphology and homogeneous parenchyma, with adequate echogenicity (head 1.8 cm, body 1.4 cm, and tail 1.6 cm). |
| Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography | Liver with regular, well-defined edges and homogeneous parenchymal signal intensity. Non-dilated intrahepatic bile ducts with normal course and caliber. Gallbladder with preserved morphology and normal dimensions, normal wall thickness and homogeneous fluid-isointense content. Unremarkable extrahepatic bile ducts including the common hepatic duct, choledochus with normal caliber and course and no interior lesions. Pancreas with regular and well-defined edges, normal thickness, a homogeneous signal intensity with no abnormal enhancement, and unrestricted diffusion-weighted sequences. |
| Endoscopic ultrasound | Pancreas with a homogeneous parenchyma, a regular, non-dilated main pancreatic duct (maximum diameter 1.79 cm at the neck). No signs of chronic pancreatitis. |
| Pancreatic biopsy | Head of the pancreas: Architecture conserved. Acini, ducts, and Langerhans islets with normal histologic characteristics. No inflammatory infiltrate, atrophy, necrosis, calcifications, or adipose infiltration. No fibrosis observed with Masson’s staining. |
| No histologic alterations in the pancreatic tissue. | |
| Gallbladder biopsy | Measures 3.6 × 2 × 1.1 cm, surface with congested blood vessels, opaque, greenish-brown serosa. Bile leakage when cut, wall thickness 0.2 cm, mucosal surface dark green and velvety. Chronic acalculous cholecystitis. |
ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; c-HDL: HDL cholesterol; c-LDL: LDL cholesterol; CMV: cytomegalovirus; DB: direct bilirubin; EBV: Epstein-Barr virus; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; Hb: hemoglobin; HbA1c: glycosylated hemoglobin; HBV: hepatitis B virus; Hct: hematocrit; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; HSV: herpes simplex virus; IB: indirect bilirubin; Leu: leukocytes; Lym: lymphocytes; Neu: neutrophils; Plt: platelets; TB: total bilirubin.
In cases of pancreatitis in children, especially cases classified as recurrent or chronic, a systematic and individualized diagnostic approach is essential. It favors timely detection and treatment, through ordering laboratory and imaging studies that enable etiology and severity to be identified and disease progression to be monitored (Table 2).1,8 In accordance with the proposals of the INSPPIRE study,1 our patient met the criteria for RAP: 2 distinct episodes of AP with an interval of clinical and biochemical resolution between the pancreatitis episodes. After a comprehensive clinical history, initial studies were ordered to rule out traumatic, metabolic, pharmacotoxic, and infectious causes. Imaging studies are useful for classification and for identifying the differential diagnoses, risk factors, and anatomic or obstructive abnormalities.1,4,8 To minimize radiation exposure, abdominal ultrasound is recommended as the first-line imaging study in children, for ruling out obstruction or anatomic alterations.8 The most useful finding is pancreatic duct dilatation (absent in our patient), which, depending on the findings, can be further evaluated through endoscopic ultrasound.
Diagnostic pathway: acute pancreatitis, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and chronic pancreatitis.
| Phase 1 |
|---|
| Carry out a clinical history focused on toxic substance intake (alcohol, tobacco, herbal supplements, medications), history of trauma, infections, family history of pancreatitis |
| Evaluate nutritional status (overweight/obesity) |
| Medications: metronidazole, mesalazine, mesalamine, pentamidine, mercaptopurine, azathioprine, valproic acid, vincristine, isoniazid, L-asparaginase, steroids (prednisone, dexamethasone), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole |
| Comorbidities: chronic kidney disease, innate metabolism errors (organic acidemias), type 2 diabetes mellitus |
| 1) Abdominal ultrasounda |
| 2) Complete blood count, serum triglycerides,b serum glucose, serum electrolytes (serum calciumc), PTH, pH and bicarbonate, ketones in urine, BUN, and creatinine, total IgG, serum IgG4 (if there is a family history of pancreatitis), C-reactive protein, total bilirubin, albumin, transaminases and GGT (if there is jaundice) |
| 3) Serologic tests for HAV, HBV, HCV, CMV, EBV, HS1V, HS2V, Parvovirus B19 |
| Phase 2 |
|---|
| 1) Contrast abdominal computed tomography (triple-phase) |
| 2) In cases of elevated total IgG and serum IgG4, perform ANA, anti-LKM-1, SMA |
| 3) Gene paneld for PRSS1+, CFTR+, SPINK1+, CTRC+, CPA1, PRSS2, CaSR, CEL, CLDN2, SBDS, UBR1 (+more frequent) |
| Phase 3 |
|---|
| 1) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographye |
| Phase 4 |
|---|
| 1) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyf |
| 2) Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasoundg |
| 3) Sweat electrolytes and/or expanded metabolic screening |
| Consider idiopathic etiology beforehand |
| Phase 5 |
|---|
| 1) Endoscopic ultrasound with pancreatic biopsyh |
| Consider idiopathic etiology beforehand |
| 2) Perform therapeutic test with a steroid |
| Consider a family history of autoimmune pancreatitis beforehand |
PTH: parathyroid hormone; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; IgG: immunoglobulin G; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; HAV: hepatitis A virus; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; CMV: cytomegalovirus; EBV: Epstein-Barr virus; HS1V: herpes simplex 1 virus; HS2V: herpes simplex 2 virus; ANA: antinuclear antibody; LKM-1 antibodies: liver-kidney microsomal type 1 antibodies; SMA: smooth muscle antibody; PRSS1: cationic trypsinogen; CFTR: cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; SPINK1: serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1; CTRC: chymotrypsin C; CPA1: carboxypeptidase A1, PRSS2: anionic trypsinogen; CaSR: calcium-sensing receptor; CEL: carboxyl ester lipase; CLDN2: claudin-2; SBDS: Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome; UBR1: N-recognin 1 component of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase complex.
First-option imaging study. The most useful finding is dilation of the pancreatic duct (1-6 years: >1.5 mm, 7-12 years >1.9 mm,13-18 years >2.2 mm).
Hypertriglyceridemia: mild 150-199 mg/dL, moderate 200-999 mg/dL, severe 1000-1999 mg/dL, very severe ≥2000 mg/dL.
Consider when there are 2 episodes of acute pancreatitis, and if there is a family history of pancreatitis and/or rapid progression.
In cases with increased GGT. Secretin improves visualization of the bile ducts and pancreatic ducts.
Biliary pancreatitis secondary to choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, pancreatic duct dilatation/stricture.
According to the current literature, if a biliary cause is identified (gallstones, microlithiasis, or biliary sludge) in the pediatric population, cholecystectomy is indicated during the same hospitalization, to prevent the recurrence of pancreatitis.5 In the present case, the postoperative outcome was favorable.
This report highlights the importance of a systematic diagnostic approach, and even when the INSPPIRE diagnostic criteria are taken into account,1 episodes of uncommon etiologies may occur that hinder providing a timely diagnosis and treatment, having an impact on recurrence and/or complications.
Ethical considerationsThe authors declare they reviewed the clinical records for the data collection, which they managed confidentially so that no patient was identified. Authorization by an Ethics Committee was not necessary, nor were signed statements of informed consent
Financial disclosureNo financial support was received in relation to this article.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.



