Suggestions
Idioma
Journal Information
Visits
106
Original article
Full text access
Available online 25 May 2026

Surgical management of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: 22 years of experience at a tertiary care hospital in Mexico

Manejo quirúrgico de neoplasias quísticas de páncreas: 22 años de experiencia en un hospital de tercer nivel en México
Visits
106
J. Canto-Losa, C. Moreno-Licea, J.J. Rosales-de la Rosa, E. Ramírez-García, C. Chan, I. Domínguez-Rosado
Corresponding author
ismaeldominguez83@gmail.com

Corresponding author. Dirección de Cirugía «Dr. Héctor Orozco». Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico. Address: Avenida Vasco de Quiroga 15, Colonia Belisario Dominguez sección XVI, C.P. 14080. Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico. Phone: 55 5487 0900 (extension 2140)
Cirugía “Dr. Héctor Orozco”, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (6)
fig0005
fig0010
fig0015
fig0020
fig0025
fig0030
Tables (7)
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients included in the study.
Tables
Table 2. Surgical techniques employed for the resection of the cystic neoplasms of the pancreas in the study patients.
Tables
Table 3. Postoperative results of 139 patients operated on for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.
Tables
Table 4. Comparison of the postoperative results of patients with pancreatoduodenectomy with those who underwent other surgical procedures.
Tables
Table 5. Comparison of the postoperative results based on histologic subtype of the resected lesion.
Tables
Table 6. Oncologic characteristics and composition of the cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.
Tables
Table 7. National and international histologic differences.
Tables
Abstract
Introduction and aims

Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas (CNPs) are diverse lesions that are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Even though they are rare, the frequency of their diagnosis has increased with the advances made in imaging techniques. The identification and adequate characterization of these lesions is essential for determining the need for surgical intervention and individual patient follow-up. The primary aim of the present study was to describe the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of the CNPs resected over a 22-year period at a Mexican referral center, along with their postoperative results.

Material and methods

A retrospective, observational study was conducted on 139 patients who underwent surgical resection within the time frame of January 2000 and December 2022. The clinical and histopathologic characteristics and 30-day postoperative outcomes were described, comparing them, based on histologic subtypes and the surgical techniques employed.

Results

Most of the CNPs were solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) (35.3%), followed by mucinous cystadenoma (32.4%), and serous cystadenoma (16.5%). The postoperative complication rate was 39.6%, and was higher in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, compared with the rest of the techniques (53.5 vs 33.3%, p = 0.038). There were no differences between histologic subtypes.

Conclusions

Precise classification of CNPs is crucial for adequate management. The higher frequency of diagnosis appears to be due to improved imaging techniques, enabling the timely identification of pancreatic cystic lesions with malignant potential, such as CNPs, and the possibility of providing early surgical treatment with curative potential.

Keywords:
Pancreatic cyst
Pancreatoduodenectomy
Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas
Resumen
Introducción y objetivos

Las neoplasias quísticas de páncreas (NQP) son lesiones diversas que representan un desafío diagnóstico y terapéutico. Aunque son poco comunes, su frecuencia de diagnóstico ha aumentado con el avance de las técnicas de imagen. La identificación y caracterización adecuada de estas lesiones es esencial para determinar la necesidad de intervenciones quirúrgicas y el seguimiento de los pacientes. El objetivo principal de este estudio es describir las características clínicas e histopatológicas de las NQP resecadas en los últimos 22 años en un centro de referencia en México, así como sus resultados postoperatorios.

Material y métodos

Estudio retrospectivo observacional de 139 pacientes, sometidos a resección quirúrgica durante enero del 2000 a diciembre del 2022. Se describieron las características clínicas, histopatológicas y los resultados postoperatorios a 30 días, comparando los mismos con base en los subtipos histológicos y las técnicas quirúrgicas empleadas.

Resultados

La mayoría de las NQP fueron neoplasias sólidas pseudopapilares (NSP, 35.3%), seguidos de cistoadenoma mucinoso (32.4%) y cistoadenoma seroso (16.5%). La tasa de complicaciones postoperatorias fue del 39.6%, siendo mayor en el grupo de pancreatoduodenectomía comparado con el resto de técnicas quirúrgicas (53.5 vs 33.3%, p = 0.038), sin diferencias entre subtipos histológicos.

Conclusiones

La clasificación precisa de las NQP es crucial para un manejo adecuado. La mayor frecuencia del diagnóstico parece deberse a una mejora en las técnicas de imagen, lo que permite identificar lesiones quísticas pancreáticas con potencial maligno de forma oportuna, como las NSP, otorgando un tratamiento quirúrgico temprano con potencial curativo.

Palabras clave:
Quiste pancreático
Pancreatoduodenectomía
Neoplasias quísticas del páncreas
Neoplasia mucinosa-papilar intraductal pancreática
Graphical abstract
Full Text
Introduction and aims

Over the past few decades, cystic neoplasms of the pancreas (CNPs) have been identified with increasing frequency due to the widespread availability of better-quality imaging studies,1 which have shown a prevalence of 2 to 15%.2–4

CNPs are commonly detected incidentally during the approach to a non-specific abdominal symptom. These lesions make up a histologically heterogeneous group, with a wide spectrum of biologic and clinical behavior. They consist of predominantly benign lesions, lesions with malignant potential, and malignant lesions,5–7 with an overall low risk of malignancy (0.5–1.5%) and annual progression (0.5%).8–10

The management of patients with CNPs may be complex and vary considerably among the different subtypes. An accurate classification of pancreatic cystic lesions is crucial and often based on clinical presentation and radiologic characteristics.

In general, premalignant lesions require resection and/or follow-up and malignant lesions require resection, whereas benign or indolent lesions may be observed.

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and histopathologic characteristics and postoperative results of CNPs resected over the past 22 years at a tertiary care referral center for the management of said lesions.

Material and methods

A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted, following the methodology described in the STROBE checklist guidelines.

All patients who underwent CNP resection at our center within the time frame of January 2000 and December 2022 were reviewed. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative information was analyzed, including the indication for surgery, pancreatic resection technique employed, surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, histopathologic report, postoperative complications (reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, considering a classification ≥ IIIA a major complication), hospital stay, the development of a biliary or pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, the need for reintervention, tumor recurrence, and survival in the long-term follow-up. Patient information was obtained from the hospital’s electronic clinical records, as well as from outpatient consultation follow-up notes. Patients who met the inclusion criteria but did not participate were not identified, given that the information came from a retrospective hospital registry, and so all available cases were included. The data collection was completed in September 2024. The variables with missing information were reviewed and registered; data missing from the case records were considered “unavailable” and not assigned a value.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac, version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and R (v4.3.2; R Core Team, 2023) statistical software. The continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) when they followed a normal distribution, or as median with interquartile range (IQR) when they did not. The categorical variables were expressed as absolute frequencies and percentages.

Distribution normality of the quantitative data was evaluated through the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Shapiro-Wilk test, and Q-Q plot analysis. Two-group comparisons were made using the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test (for expected low frequencies), and Mann-Whitney U test When more than two groups were compared, the chi-square test for categorical variables was used, with a 2 × 2 post-hoc analysis, if there were statistically significant differences. For the quantitative variables, the ANOVA was used in cases of parametric distribution, otherwise the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The post-hoc analyses were performed with the Bonferroni correction for the parametric samples and the Games-Howell test for the nonparametric samples. Statistical significance was set at a p < 0.05.

Ethical considerations

The present study was approved by the Ethics and Human Research Committee of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y NutriciónSalvador Zubirán”, with registration number SCI-5001-24-24-1. The research was conducted according to the principles established in the Declaration of Helsinki and the current bioethical regulations in Mexico. Given that this is a retrospective study in which the clinical information was routinely analyzed and duly anonymized, requesting individual informed consent was not necessary. No personal imaging or data that could identify patients were included. The authors declare that this article contains no personal information that could identify patients.

Results

One hundred and thirty-nine patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified and included in the study. Table 1 summarizes their demographic and clinical characteristics. The median follow-up duration was 30 (12−56) months. The main symptom was abdominal pain (76.3%), with a lower percentage of patients presenting with weight loss (27.3%) (8 kg [3–15]). Diagnosis was incidental in 16 patients (11.5%) undergoing an imaging study for another cause. Tumor location was very similar, with 47 (33.8%) cases in the head of the pancreas, 47 (33.8%) in the neck/body of the pancreas, and 45 (32.4%) in the tail of the pancreas.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients included in the study.

Variable  Median (IQR)/Frequency (%) 
Sex   
Male  15 (10.8%) 
Female  124 (89.2%) 
Age (years)  43 (30.7−61.2) 
Follow-up (months)  30 (12−56) 
Smoking  45 (32.4%) 
Alcoholism  57 (41%) 
Comorbidities present  68 (48.9%) 
Previous surgeries  68 (48.9%) 
Previous cholecystectomy  27 (19.4%) 
Clinical presentation
Abdominal pain  106 (76.3%) 
Nausea and/or vomiting  51 (36.7%) 
Unintentional weight loss  38 (27.3%) 
Total weight loss (kg)  8 (3–15) 
Anorexia  20 (14.4%) 
Palpable abdominal mass  20 (14.4%) 
Diarrhea  19 (13.7%) 
Jaundice  15 (10.8%) 
Fever  11 (7.9%) 
Stent use  4 (2.9%) 
Bleeding  3 (2.2%) 
Incidental finding on an imaging study  16 (11.5%) 

IQR: interquartile range.

The approach was open surgery in 134 cases (96.4%), utilizing laparoscopy in only 5 of them (3.6%). There was also a significant increase in the number of surgeries performed by year since 2009, with a maximum peak of 14 cases of resected CNPs at our center in 2016. A later descent in frequency occurred in 2020 (Fig. 1). The most common surgical procedures performed were distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (48.9%) and pancreatoduodenectomy or the Whipple procedure (30.9%) (Table 2). Concerning the postoperative results, the median surgical procedure duration for all cases was 210 min (165–300) and the estimated intraoperative blood loss was 450 mL (250–800), with 31 patients (22.3%) requiring intraoperative blood transfusion. Four patients (2.9%) required vascular reconstruction during surgery and a postoperative drain was placed in 126 (90.6%). Fifty-five patients (39.6%) presented with a complication. The most frequent was pancreatic fistula (34 patients, 24.5%), and most commonly grade B (19 patients, 13.7%). Median hospital stay was 11 days (7–16) and was longer in the group presenting with a postoperative complication, compared with the patients that did not (15 days [8–24] vs 9 days [6–14], p = 0.001). Nine patients (6.5%) required surgical reintervention and two (1.4%) died in the immediate postoperative period due to vascular complications (Table 3).

Figure 1.

Number of surgeries performed by year for resection of the cystic neoplasms of the pancreas at our center.

Table 2.

Surgical techniques employed for the resection of the cystic neoplasms of the pancreas in the study patients.

Variable  Frequency (%) 
Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy  68 (48.9%) 
Pancreatoduodenectomy or Whipple procedure  43 (30.9%) 
Subtotal pancreatectomy with splenectomy  10 (7.2%) 
Spleen-sparing distal pancreatectomy  9 (6.5%) 
Central pancreatectomy  7 (5.1%) 
Pancreatic nucleation  1 (0.7%) 
Total pancreatectomy  1 (0.7%) 
Table 3.

Postoperative results of 139 patients operated on for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Variable  Median (IQR)/frequency (%) 
Any complication  55 (39.6%) 
Major complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIA)  34 (24.5%) 
Postoperative bleeding  11 (7.9%) 
Abdominal sepsis  8 (5.8%) 
Surgical site infection  8 (5.8%) 
Pancreatic fistula  34 (24.5%) 
Grade A  14 (10.1%) 
Grade B  19 (13.7%) 
Grade C  1 (0.7%) 
Delayed gastric emptying  6 (4.3%) 
Grade A  3 (2.2%) 
Grade B  2 (1.4%) 
Grade C  1 (0.7%) 
Biliary fistula  0 (0%) 
Hospital stay (days)  11 (7–16) 
Surgical reintervention at 30 days  9 (6.5%) 
Mortality at 30 days  2 (1.4%) 

IQR: interquartile range.

In the postoperative result analysis by subgroup, based on surgical technique, the group that underwent pancreatoduodenectomy had longer surgery duration and greater estimated intraoperative blood loss (Fig. 2). They also had greater need of intraoperative blood transfusions, higher frequency of postoperative complications and of delayed gastric emptying, and longer hospital stay. There were no statistically significant differences in the rest of the postoperative results (Table 4).

Figure 2.

Box diagrams that compare the surgical time and estimated intraoperative bleeding in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and those who underwent other surgical procedures, with a p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively, on the Mann-Whitney U test.

Table 4.

Comparison of the postoperative results of patients with pancreatoduodenectomy with those who underwent other surgical procedures.

Variable  Pancreatoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure)  Other surgical procedures  Odds ratio (95% CI)  p value 
  n = 43  n = 96     
Surgical time (min)  300 (240–360)  180 (150–240)  –  <0.001 
Estimated intraoperative bleeding (ml)  700 (350–1250)  300 (200–737.5)  –  0.001 
Intraoperative transfusion  17 (39.5%)  14 (14.6%)  3.78 (1.6–8.7)  0.002 
Vascular reconstruction  3 (6.9%)  1 (1.04%)  7.45 (0.7–74)  0.081 
Any complication  23 (53.5%)  32 (33.3%)  2.3 (1.1–4.8)  0.038 
Major complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIA)  13 (30.2%)  21 (21.8%)  1.54 (0.6–3.4)  0.393 
Postoperative bleeding  5 (11.6%)  6 (6.2%)  1.97 (0.5–6.8)  0.315 
Abdominal sepsis  3 (6.9%)  5 (5.2%)  1.36 (0.3–5.9)  0.703 
Surgical site infection  5 (11.6%)  3 (3.1%)  4.03 (0.9–17.7)  0.108 
Pancreatic fistula  7 (16.2%)  27 (28.1%)  0.49 (0.1–1.2)  0.143 
Grade A  4 (9.3%)  10 (10.4%)  0.88 (0.2–2.9)  >0.99 
Grade B  2 (4.6%)  17 (17.7%)  0.22 (0.05–1.02)  0.059 
Grade C  1 (2.3%)  0 (0%)  –  0.309 
Delayed gastric emptying  6 (13.9%)  0 (0%)  –  0.001 
Grade A  3 (6.9%)  0 (0%)  –  0.028 
Grade B  2 (4.6%)  0 (0%)  –  0.094 
Grade C  1 (2.3%)  0 (0%)  –  0.309 
Biliary fistula  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  –  – 
Hospital stay (days)  15 (7–22)  9 (6–14)  –  0.009 
Surgical reintervention at 30 days  5 (11.6%)  3 (3.2%)  4.07 (0.9–17.9)  0.107 
Mortality at 30 days  2 (4.6%)  0 (0%)  –  0.094 

95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

Regarding histopathologic classification after resection, the most common histologic subtypes were solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) (49 patients, 35.3%), followed by mucinous cystadenoma (mucinous cystic neoplasm [MCN]) (45 patients, 32.4%), and serous cystadenoma (serous cystic neoplasm [SCN]) (23 patients, 16.5%) (Fig. 3). A lesion with malignant potential (SPN, MCN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm [IPMN]) was found in 112 patients (80.5%), with a 92.8% R0 resection rate. Eighteen cases (12.9%) corresponded to IPMNs, two of which arose from the main branch, four from the secondary branch, four were mixed, and the originating branch could not be identified in eight cases. The phenotype was intestinal in three cases, pancreatobiliary in one case, gastric in another, and the phenotype could not be identified in the remaining cases. There was also an increase in the diagnostic frequency of this lesion starting in 2009 (Figs. 4 and 5).

Figure 3.

Frequency of the histologic subtypes found in the cystic neoplasms of the pancreas after their resection.

Figure 4.

Frequency of diagnosis of each of the histologic subtypes in nonmalignant lesions, studied by 5-year periods. There was a rising trend starting in the 2010-2014 period for all lesions, with a later descent in the 2020–2022 period, a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no statistically significant differences between each of the time periods, according to the chi-square test (p = 0.343).

Figure 5.

Number of the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) diagnoses by year at our center. There was an increase in frequency starting in 2009, maintaining the rising trend.

When the postoperative results based on lesion histologic subtype were compared, there were statistically significant differences between the subtypes in relation to resection surgery duration. The post-hoc analysis showed a significant difference between the SPN and MCN groups, in which the SPN group had a longer median duration (p = 0.035). There was also a greater frequency of surgical site infection in the IPMN group (IPMN 22.2% vs 3.4% for the rest of the lesions, OR 8 [95% CI 1.7–35.6]), as well as of grade B delayed gastric emptying (IPMN 11.1% vs 0% for the rest of the lesions, p = 0.017). A trend toward a greater frequency of postoperative complications was observed in the IPMN and SPN groups, along with a greater frequency of pancreatic fistula in the MCN group, without reaching statistical significance when compared with the other groups (Table 5).

Table 5.

Comparison of the postoperative results based on histologic subtype of the resected lesion.

Variable  Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm  Mucinous cystadenoma  Serous cystadenoma  IPMN  p value 
  n = 49  n = 45  n = 23  n = 18   
Surgical time (min)  240 (172.5–325)  180 (145–247.5)  210 (162–240)  260 (200–317.25)  0.016a 
Estimated intraoperative bleeding (mL)  500 (200–800)  300 (250–700)  500 (300–1200)  750 (200–987.5)  0.122 
Intraoperative transfusion  11 (22.4%)  7 (15.5%)  7 (30.4%)  3 (16.6%)  0.509 
Vascular reconstruction  2 (4.08%)  1 (2.2%)  1 (4.3%)  0 (0%)  0.907 
Any complication  19 (38.7%)  20 (44.4%)  6 (26.08%)  8 (44.4%)  0.509 
Major complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIA)  13 (26.5%)  12 (26.6%)  3 (13.04%)  6 (33.3%)  0.47 
Postoperative bleeding  5 (10.2%)  2 (4.4%)  2 (8.6%)  2 (11.1%)  0.694 
Abdominal sepsis  3 (6.1%)  4 (8.8%)  0 (0%)  1 (5.5%)  0.614 
Surigal site infection  2 (4.08%)  1 (2.2%)  1 (4.3%)  4 (22.2%)  0.042b 
Pancreatic fistula  12 (24.4%)  16 (35.5%)  2 (8.6%)  4 (22.2%)  0.109 
Grade A  4 (8.1%)  6 (13.3%)  1 (4.3%)  3 (16.6%)  0.515 
Grade B  7 (14.2%)  10 (22.2%)  1 (4.3%)  1 (5.5%)  0.185 
Grade C  1 (2.04%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  >0.99 
Delayed gastric emptying  1 (2.04%)  2 (4.4%)  0 (0%)  3 (16.6%)  0.08 
Grade A  0 (0%)  2 (4.4%)  0 (0%)  1 (5.5%)  0.202 
Grade B  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  2 (11.1%)  0.017 
Grade C  1 (2.04%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  >0.99 
Biliary fistula  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  – 
Hospital stay (days)  11 (7–19)  12 (7–15)  10 (7–15)  8 (6–18)  0.881 
Surgical reintervention at 30 days  4 (8.1%)  1 (2.2%)  1 (4.3%)  2 (11.1%)  0.446 
Mortality at 30 days  1 (2.04%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  1 (5.5%)  0.278 

IPMN: intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

a

The post-hoc analysis with the Games-Howell test showed statistically significant differences between solid pseudopapillary neoplasm and mucinous cystadenoma (p = 0.035, 95% CI [3.13–122.25]), but not in the rest of the histologic subtypes.

b

In the chi-square analysis, comparing the IPMN group (n = 18) with the rest of the nonmalignant cystic lesions (n = 117), there was an OR of 8 [95% CI 1.79–35.6] with a p = 0.012 for the appearance of surgical site infection.

The frequency of malignant lesions was low, with only four cases (2.8%); two (1.4%) were the mucinous cystadenocarcinoma subtype, one (0.7%) was solid pseudopapillary carcinoma, and one (0.7%) was intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma. Of the malignant lesions, one had tumor extension into the lymph nodes and lymphovascular invasion, with negative margins, corresponding to one of the mucinous cystadenocarcinoma cases (5/15 positive lymph nodes), and one had perineural invasion and positive tumor margins, corresponding to the case of solid pseudopapillary carcinoma. R0 resection was achieved in the rest of the malignant lesions (3 cases, 75%), with a median of 10.5 (2–25) resected lymph nodes. Of those four patients, the female patient with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma received 12 sessions of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment, with the last application at seven months after the surgery; there was later evidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis and the presence of metastatic lesions in the lung three years after the surgery; tumor progression was documented and the patient was later lost to follow-up. The female patient with intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma died 4.4 years after resection, due to acute tubular necrosis, in the context of active tuberculosis; no recurrence of complications associated with the surgery were documented during her follow-up. The other two cases were lost to follow-up after the surgery.

The median tumor size of all the CNPs was 55 mm (35.5–95.5), whereas it was 66.5 mm (43.2–92) for the four malignant lesions (p = 0.677). Finally, in the long-term follow-up of the patients with CNPs with malignant potential, two (1.7%) presented with tumor recurrence and disease progression; both were patients with SPN. Table 6 summarizes the oncologic characteristics and composition of the CNPs.

Table 6.

Oncologic characteristics and composition of the cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Variable  Median (IQR)/frequency (%) 
Lesions with no malignant potential  23 (16.6%) 
Lesions con malignant potential  112 (80.6%) 
Malignant lesions  4 (2.8%) 
Mortality  2 (1.4%) 
Tumor size (mm)  55 (35.5–95.5) 
Pre/postoperative CA19.9 (IU/L)  8.4 (4.6–16.2)/4.35 (0.8–9.9) 
Pre/postoperative CEA (IU/L)  2.07 (0.9–3.5)/0.9 (0.6–6.8) 
Solid component  52 (37.4%) 
Cystic component  110 (79.1%) 
Calcifications  27 (19.4%) 
Septa  33 (23.7%) 
R0 rate   
Lesions with malignant potential (n = 112)  92.8% 
Malignant lesions (n = 4)  75% 
Tumor recurrence   
Lesions with malignant potential (n = 112)  2 (1.7%) 
Malignant lesions (n = 4)  1 (25%) 

CA19.9: carbohydrate antigen 19.9; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; IQR: interquartile range.

Discussion

CNPs are a relevant group of tumors due to their wide variety of presentations, ranging from practically benign, to premalignant, to openly malignant tumors, with a heterogeneous prognosis.1

Throughout 22 years of experience in the management of CNPs at a tertiary care referral center, we have seen a high frequency of neoplasms with malignant potential (80.5%). SPNs (35.3%) and MCNs (32.4%) stand out at our center as the most frequent subtypes, followed by SCNs (16.5%) and IPMNs (12.9%). The overall postoperative complication rate was 39.6%, of which 24.5% were classified as major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIA). The most frequent complication was pancreatic fistula (24.5%), primarily grade B (13.7%). Perioperative mortality was low (1.4%), similar to that at high-volume centers (0.5−0.9%),1,8,9 and lower than that reported in smaller case series (6-9%).11,12 A total of 1.7% of the patients, specifically those with SPNs, had tumor recurrence, highlighting the need for long-term follow-up.

Regarding the histologic distribution of the CNPs, there were significant regional variations. In high-volume international centers, such as Massachusetts General Hospital8 and Memorial Sloan Kettering,1 in the United States, and the Pancreatic Surgery Unit of the University of Verona,9 in Italy, IPMNs and MCNs predominated, whereas in our case series the SPNs stood out notably, partially coinciding with previous studies in Mexico,11 but contrasting with that reported in other regions13−14 (Table 7). Differing from the above, in another case series conducted in China, SCNs were the most common (35.1%), followed by SPNs (31.5%), whereas MCNs had a lower prevalence,15 similar to that found in other Latin American case series.16–18 Those differences could be attributed to demographic variations, as well as to the relatively low rate of incidental diagnoses at our center (11.5%), compared with international rates (15–25%), possibly conditioned by differences in access to diagnostic imaging studies and their quality.19

Table 7.

National and international histologic differences.

Author (year)  Country  n  MCN  SCN  SPN  IPMN 
Gaujoux et al. (2011)1  New York, USA  442  11%  23%  2%  27% 
Valsangkar et al. (2012)8  Boston, Mass.,USA  851  23 %  16%  3%  38% 
Butte et al. (2004)25  Santiago, Chile  11  54%  27%  9%  9% 
Mori et al. (2012)17  Lima, Peru  12  17%  41%  25%  17% 
Targarona et al. (2014)16  Lima, Peru  146  18%  41%  16%  25% 
Domingues et al (2005)12  Porto Alegre, Brazil  44%  33%  0%  11% 
Sia et al. (2018)*,18  Sao Paolo, Brazil  21  23%  28%  19%  28% 
Salvia et al. (2012)9  Verona, Italy  476  25%  14%  8%  48% 
Bai et al. (2014)15  Zhejiang, China  111  18%  35%  35%  15% 
Jordán-Pérez et al. (2007)14  Guadalajara, Mexico  33%  50%  0%  0% 
Feria et al. (2011)13  Mexico City, Mexico  19  33%  22%  21%  0% 
Chapa et al. (2017)11  Mexico City, Mexico  18  33%  22%  33%  0% 
Canto et al. (2025)a  Mexico City, Mexico  139  32%  16%  35%  12% 
a

Data from the present study included 18 pancreatic pseudocysts in a sample of 39 patients.

A significant increase in the frequency of diagnosed cystic tumors has been seen over time, coinciding with a higher number of surgeries performed on our population. In particular, since 2009, surgical interventions have increased progressively, reaching a peak of 14 cases of CNPs operated on in 2016, followed by a descent in 2020. Said increase was accompanied by greater incidental detection of the neoplasms, an important percentage of the diagnoses, reflecting a growing trend in the identification of CNPs through imaging studies carried out for other causes. The increase in IPMN cases was especially striking, with a considerable increase in the frequency of their diagnosis in 2009. That phenomenon is consistent with the findings by Valsangkar et al.,8 who reported a notable increase in the relative number of IPMNs over the past three decades, going from being diagnosed in only 2% of cases before 1991, to currently being diagnosed in 49% of patients with resected CNPs. The above contrasts with that described in other Mexican case series, in which no cases were reported.11,13,14 Even though some authors question whether this increase reflects a true rise in incidence or is simply a result of greater detection due to advances in imaging techniques and pathologic classifications, the results in our population suggest a similar trend, possibly attributed to better diagnostic capacity and greater clinical awareness about mucinous neoplasms.

Unlike the worldwide trend toward performing minimally invasive procedures, open surgery widely predominates at our center (96.4%), most likely influenced by the anatomic complexity and considerable tumor size seen in our cases. This is comparable with the case series by Chapa et al. in Mexico, in which only 11% of the cases were laparoscopic.11 In contrast, international studies have reported a gradual increase in the use of laparoscopy, which is associated with fewer complications and reduced hospital stay.19,20

The surgical procedures performed more frequently on our population were distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (48.9%) and pancreatoduodenectomy or the Whipple procedure (30.9%), achieving R0 resection rates (92.8%), differing from the 82% reported in other countries,1 which is similar to rates at other international centers. However, the appearance of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIA in 24.5%) underlines the need to optimize preoperative strategies and intraoperative management, especially in high-complexity procedures, such as pancreatoduodenectomy, which showed longer surgery duration, greater intraoperative blood loss, and longer hospital stay, similar to that reported in other case series.21–23

Regarding postoperative complications, pancreatic fistula presented in 24.5% of the patients, a trend also reported in other studies,8,11 with a greater frequency in MCNs. Complications were also higher in the group that underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (30.2% vs 21.8%), coinciding with reports that emphasize the morbidity associated with the procedure.24

Lastly, the frequency of malignancy was low, consistent with that reported in other studies, with a percentage below 3% in resected CNPs.8

Our results underline the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and the continuous evaluation of results to improve surgical safety and the quality of care of patients with CNPs.

Conclusions

The present study provides a broad vision of the clinical and surgical profile of CNPs in our population. The high prevalence of SPNs and MCNs highlights the importance of considering population and geographic factors upon interpreting epidemiologic data. Even though the low frequency of malignancy observed in the CNPs is consistent with that reported in the literature, the presence of recurrence in some cases emphasizes the need for continuous and personalized follow-up.

Surgical management showed high complete resection rates (R0), with postoperative complications and pancreatic fistulas comparable to that reported at international centers. It is an area of continuous improvement, through the implementation of more advanced safe resection techniques.

These findings strengthen the relevance of a multidisciplinary focus for optimizing management and improving outcomes in this complex disease.

Financial disclosure

No specific grants were received from public sector agencies, the business sector, or non-profit organizations in relation to this study.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
S. Gaujoux, M.F. Brennan, M. Gonen, et al.
Cystic lesions of the pancreas: changes in the presentation and management of 1,424 patients at a single institution over a 15-year time period.
J Am Coll Surg, 212 (2011), pp. 590-603
[2]
S. Romutis, R. Brand.
Burden of new pancreatic cyst diagnosis.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 33 (2023), pp. 487-495
[3]
K. de Jong, C.Y. Nio, J.J. Hermans, et al.
High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 8 (2010), pp. 806-811
[4]
M.-L. Kromrey, R. Bülow, J. Hübner, et al.
Prospective study on the incidence, prevalence and 5-year pancreatic-related mortality of pancreatic cysts in a population-based study.
[5]
W.R. Brugge, G.Y. Lauwers, D. Sahani, et al.
Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.
N Engl J Med, 351 (2004), pp. 1218-1226
[6]
J. Compagno, J.E. Oertel.
Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas with overt and latent malignancy (cystadenocarcinoma and cystadenoma). A clinicopathologic study of 41 cases.
Am J Clin Pathol, 69 (1978), pp. 573-580
[7]
J. Compagno, J.E. Oertel.
Microcystic adenomas of the pancreas (glycogen-rich cystadenomas): a clinicopathologic study of 34 cases.
Am J Clin Pathol, 69 (1978), pp. 289-298
[8]
N.P. Valsangkar, V. Morales-Oyarvide, S.P. Thayer, et al.
851 resected cystic tumors of the pancreas: a 33-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital.
Surgery, 152 (2012), pp. S4-12
[9]
R. Salvia, G. Malleo, G. Marchegiani, et al.
Pancreatic resections for cystic neoplasms: from the surgeon’s presumption to the pathologist’s reality.
Surgery, 152 (2012), pp. S135-42
[10]
P.J. Allen, M. D’Angelica, M. Gonen, et al.
A selective approach to the resection of cystic lesions of the pancreas: results from 539 consecutive patients.
[11]
O. Chapa-Azuela, C.V. Gopar-Ochoa, A. Etchegaray-Dondé, et al.
Neoplasias quísticas de páncreas: una causa más de dolor abdominal inespecífico. Experiencia terapéutica de 10 años en la Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Pancreato-Biliar del Hospital General de México.
Cir Gen, 37 (2017), pp. 13-18
[12]
L.A. Domingues, M.F. Chedid, E. Lombardi, et al.
Radical surgical treatment for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: personal experience.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru, 25 (2005), pp. 42-47
[13]
G. Feria-Feria, E.C. Carrera-Mayor, D.A. Hernández-Ramírez, et al.
Tumores quísticos de páncreas. Informe de 10 años.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc, 49 (2011), pp. 185-190
[14]
B. Jordán-Pérez, F. Javier-Haro, E. Gómez-Herrera, et al.
Neoplasias quísticas pancreáticas.
Cir Cir, 76 (2008), pp. 299-303
[15]
X. Bai, L. Ye, Q. Zhang, et al.
Surgical resection and outcome of pancreatic cystic neoplasms in China: analysis of a 16-year experience from a single high-volume academic institution.
World J Surg Oncol, 12 (2014), pp. 228
[16]
J. Targarona, L. Aliaga, M. Reynel, et al.
Características clínico patológicas de los tumores quísticos del páncreas.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru, 34 (2014), pp. 311-314
[17]
E. Mori, K. Yuen, H. Medrano, et al.
Manejo de tumores quísticos del páncreas en el Hospital Alberto Sabogal Sologuren.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru, 32 (2012), pp. 169-177
[18]
G.B. Sia, P.F. Soares, M.A. Gestic, et al.
Surgical management of cystic lesions of the pancreas: a single-centre experience.
Arq Gastroenterol, 55 (2018), pp. 412-416
[19]
M. Pfister, P. Probst, P.C. Müller, et al.
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic surgery: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
[20]
I. Damoli, G. Butturini, M. Ramera, et al.
Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery - a review.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 10 (2015), pp. 141-149
[21]
M. Aizpuru, P. Starlinger, D.M. Nagorney, et al.
Contemporary outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and precancerous cystic lesions.
HPB (Oxford), 24 (2022), pp. 1416-1424
[22]
G. Romano, A. Agrusa, M. Galia, et al.
Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy: surgical technique and perioperative clinical outcomes in a single center.
Int J Surg, 21 (2015), pp. S68-71
[23]
D.J. Gouma, R.C. van Geenen, T.M. van Gulik, et al.
Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.
[24]
B.-Y. Hu, T. Wan, W.-Z. Zhang, et al.
Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy.
World J Gastroenterol, 22 (2016), pp. 7797-7805
[25]
J.M. Butte, M.E. Norero, G.I. Duarte, et al.
Tumores quísticos del páncreas.
Rev Chil Cir, 56 (2004), pp. 341-345
Copyright © 2025. Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología
Download PDF
Idiomas
Revista de Gastroenterología de México
Article options
Tools