Journal Information
Vol. 81. Issue 2.
Pages 63-64 (April - June 2016)
Vol. 81. Issue 2.
Pages 63-64 (April - June 2016)
Editorial
Open Access
Gastric cancer in Mexico: Improvement, but still a long way to go
El cáncer gástrico en México: mejoría, pero aún con mucho por hacerse
Visits
8237
J. Meza-Juncoa,
Corresponding author
judith.mezajunco@albertahealthservices.ca

Corresponding author. Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada, Tel.: +780 432-8514.
, A.J. Montano-Lozab
a Department of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
b Division of Gastroenterology & Liver Unit, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

Gastric cancer (GC) is the second cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide1 and is also responsible for one of the highest cancer burdens, as measured by disability-adjusted life years lost.2 Approximately 65% of GC patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, and the majority will have systemic disease at some time during the course of their illness.3

In this issue of the Revista Mexicana de Gastroenterología, Sánchez-Barriga4 reported that between 2002-2012, 69,107 patients in Mexico died from GC. In the year 2000, there were 5,003 deaths from GC and in 2012, 5,459 individuals died from this malignancy. The mortality rate adjusted for age for GC was 5.6 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2012, and this study showed that the mortality rate from GC in Mexico decreased from 7.5 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2000.4 Some notes of caution are in order. Mortality rates may be modified over time, due to improved diagnosis, better medical care, increase in identification of cases, and better records, as well as changes in the prevalence of risk factors. The study by Sánchez-Barriga emphasizes the association between poverty and GC. The state of Chiapas had the highest poverty rate in Mexico in 2012,5 with 74.7% of the population living in extreme poverty.4 This state also had the highest death rate from GC in 2000 (9.2; 95% CI: 8.2-10.3) and in 2012 (8.2; 95% CI: 7.3-9). Furthermore, Chiapas had the highest rate of years of potential life lost rate during the study period (97.4 in 2000 and 79.6 in 2012). This association could be explained by the higher prevalence of H. pylori infection in rural areas, where potable water is limited and poor sanitary conditions are frequent. H. pylori infection is estimated to account for more than 60% of GC,6 and more than 5% of all cancer worldwide.7 Moreover, treatments to eradicate H. pylori infection in asymptomatic subjects have been shown to decrease the frequency of both precancerous gastric lesions and GC in Asian countries.8

This study also highlights the fact that GC is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate, and that the majority of GC patients in clinical practice have advanced disease at diagnosis. Despite the progress made in diagnosis, surgical techniques, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, prognosis for GC remains poor.

Currently, in rural areas in North America with an increased incidence of H. pylori infection and GC,9 there are working groups whose goal is to identify effective treatment strategies and develop recommendations for health policy aimed at management of H. pylori infection and reduction of GC. In addition, screening for GC could be useful in detecting asymptomatic patients with early GC in high-prevalence areas,10 which, in turn, would increase the number of treatable cancers and improve overall survival. Therefore, the adoption of such strategies should be considered for areas in Mexico with a high prevalence of GC.

In conclusion, despite the reduction in the incidence of GC in Mexico comparable to the decrease in incidence worldwide,7 this disease continues to be a major health problem in Mexico, with a significantly negative social impact from the premature deaths caused by GC. Three major potential areas for development should be recognized: 1) Improved sanitation and access to potable water could result in a further reduction of prevalence of H. pylori infection and GC; 2) GC screening for early recognition of high-risk patients for GC,11 such as those with atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, gastric ulcer, or dysplasia, especially in areas with the least favorable education, occupation, health, housing, and employment conditions; and 3) Improvements in GC therapy, which are expected as our understanding of GC biology and signaling pathways improves. The integration of targeted therapies is already possible and early results are promising. Better therapy selection for individual patients may also significantly improve treatment and patient survival.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
L.A. Torre, F. Bray, R.L. Siegel, et al.
Global Cancer Statistics, 2012.
CA Cancer J Clin, 65 (2015), pp. 87-108
[2]
I. Soerjomataram, J. Lortet-Tieulent, D.M. Parkin, et al.
Global burden of cancer in 2008: A systematic analysis of disability-adjusted life-years in 12 world regions.
Lancet, 380 (2012), pp. 1840-1850
[3]
J. Meza-Junco, M.B. Sawyer.
Metastatic gastric cancer - focus on targeted therapies.
Biologics, 6 (2012), pp. 137-146
[4]
J.J. Sánchez-Barriga.
Tendencias de mortalidad y años potenciales de vida perdidos por cáncer gástrico en México, 2000-2012.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 81 (2016), pp. 65-73
[6]
D.M. Parkin.
The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002.
Int J Cancer, 118 (2006), pp. 3030-3044
[7]
C. de Martel, J. Ferlay, S. Franceschi, et al.
Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: A review and synthetic analysis.
Lancet Oncol, 13 (2012), pp. 607-615
[8]
J.L. Ma, L. Zhang, L.M. Brown, et al.
Fifteen-year effects of Helicobacter pylori, garlic, and vitamin treatments on gastric cancer incidence and mortality.
J Natl Cancer Inst, 104 (2012), pp. 488-492
[9]
K.J. Goodman, K. Jacobson, S. Veldhuyzen van Zanten.
Helicobacter pylori infection in Canadian and related Arctic Aboriginal populations.
Can J Gastroenterol, 22 (2008), pp. 289-295
[10]
E. Khanderia, S.R. Markar, A. Acharya, et al.
The influence of gastric cancer screening on the stage at diagnosis and survival: A meta-analysis of comparative studies in the Far East.
J Clin Gastroenterol, 50 (2016), pp. 190-197
[11]
H. Song, I.G. Ekheden, Z.L. Zheng, et al.
Incidence of gastric cancer among patients with gastric precancerous lesions: Observational cohort study in a low risk Western population.
BMJ, (2015), pp. 351

Please cite this article as: Meza-Junco J, Montano-Loza AJ. El cáncer gástrico en México: mejoría, pero aún con mucho por hacerse. Revista de Gastroenterología de México. 2016;82:63–64.

See related content at DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2016.03.005, Sánchez-Barriga JJ. Mortality trends and years of potential life lost from gastric cancer in Mexico, 2000-2012. Rev Gastroenterol Méx. 2016;81(2):65–73.

Copyright © 2016. Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología
Idiomas
Revista de Gastroenterología de México
Article options
Tools
es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.