Journal Information
Scientific letter
Full text access
Available online 17 April 2025
Splenic tear due to ERCP: A case report and literature review
Desgarro esplénico por CPRE: reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura
Visits
81
G. López-Arcea, D. Zamora-Valdésb,
Corresponding author
dzamora@outlook.com

Corresponding author at: Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplant Department, KASCH, KAMC, MNGHA Ar Rimayah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Tel.: (+966) 558371125.
, E. Murcio-Pérezc, M.A. Reyes-Caldelasd, F.I. Téllez-Ávilae
a Departamento de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia, Hospital Ángeles Centro Sur, Querétaro, Mexico
b Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplant Department KASCH, KAMC, MNGHA Ar Rimayah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
c Departamento de Endoscopia, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
d Departamento de Imagenología, Hospital Ángeles Acoxpa, Mexico City, Mexico
e Gastroenterology & Hepatology Division, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Full Text

Adverse events related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) include pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, and cholangitis. Splenic tear (ST) is a rare adverse event, with few reported cases worldwide.1 We present herein a case of ST following ERCP in a 41-year-old woman with no comorbidities, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy 15 days earlier and presented with a postoperative Strasberg B and C bile duct injury. She was admitted to the emergency service due to pain in the right hypochondrium and dilatation of the right intrahepatic bile duct, demonstrated through computed tomography (CT). Residual choledocholithiasis was suspected, and so ERCP was ordered. The procedure was carried out with a Pentax ED34-i10T (Pentax, Japan) duodenoscope, with the patient in the supine position. The duodenoscope passed freely into the duodenum, with no resistance, and the papilla of Vater was adequately visualized. After several failed attempts at standard cannulization with a sphincterotome, an infundibular precut was performed, revealing a retroperitoneal peri-ampullar perforation (Stapfer II) and peri-ampullar bleeding that stopped spontaneously. After the adverse event, the patient presented with tachycardia and low blood pressure and her serum hemoglobin (Hb) level dropped from 14.3 g/dl to 7.9 g/dl. A CT scan revealed hemoperitoneum (Fig. 1a and b). Emergency laparotomy with splenectomy and hemoperitoneum drainage of 1300 cc were carried out and a type 1 splenocolic ligament tear was observed (Fig. 2). During the surgery, anterograde access to the bile duct with the rendezvous technique, through choledocotomy with a 0.035″ hydrophilic guidewire, was performed. A 10 × 60 mm metallic stent (WallStent, Boston Scientific) was placed to manage the Stapfer II peri-ampullar perforation. Patient progression was satisfactory, with no signs of bleeding recurrence.

Figure 1.

a) CT scan showing hemoperitoneum, b) CT in the arterial phase, showing the ST site (blue arrow).

(0.12MB).
Figure 2.

Splenic injury secondary to a splenocolic ligament tear.

(0.2MB).

ST secondary to ERCP is a condition that can be life-threatening and there are few cases reported in the literature.1–6 Several mechanisms have been proposed: traction of the gastrosplenic or splenocolic ligament caused by a “long loop”, “bowing” of the endoscope in the “long” position, with a tear in the splenic capsule due to torsion of the greater curvature of the stomach.2–4 Difficulty in accessing the bile duct, prolonged procedure time, over-distension of the gastric chamber, manipulation of the duodenoscope, and torsion of the duodenoscope can be related to splenic injuries. Another proposed mechanism is the presence of adhesions from previous surgeries, which can cause stiffness in the spleen and adjacent organs.5 In our patient, the difficulty in accessing the bile duct and the manipulation of the duodenoscope most likely favored the ST caused by any of the pathophysiologic mechanisms described above. Diagnosis is suspected in the presence of low blood pressure, a drop in hemoglobin, and CT findings. To the best of our knowledge, the present case is the first to describe blood leakage during the procedure caused by the adverse event (Stapfer II) occurring during the precut; that finding made us suspect an adverse event different from perforation. Most patients with peri-ampullar retroperitoneal perforation can be treated during ERCP, but patients with ST should be surgically treated. Conservative management has been reported in some patients with hemodynamic instability.6

STs should be considered in patients with sudden low blood pressure and/or an abrupt drop in hemoglobin during ERCP. Diagnosis requires a high level of clinical suspicion, it should be corroborated by CT, and management is usually surgical.

Ethical considerations

  • 1

    Informed consent was requested from the patient for this work and personal identification data were omitted from the images.

  • 2

    The present work is a retrospective case report, and so its submission to the corresponding ethics committee was not required.

  • 3

    The authors declare that the images shown in the work contain no personal information that could identify the patient, ensuring her anonymity.

Financial disclosure

No financial support was received in relation to this article.

References
[1]
V. Pamudurthy, R.Z. Abraham, T. Betlej, et al.
Etiologies and risks of splenic decapsulation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: case report and literature review.
Endosc Int Open, 6 (2018), pp. E271-E273
[2]
F.W. Lewis, N. Moloo, G.V. Stiegmann, et al.
Splenic injury complicating therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and ERCP.
Gastrointest Endosc, 37 (1991), pp. 632-633
[3]
W.C. Wu, R.M. Katon.
Injury to the liver and spleen after diagnostic ERCP.
Gastrointest Endosc, 39 (1993), pp. 824-827
[4]
S. Ahmad, D. Bragg, A.M. Zaitoun, et al.
A dangerous loop.
Clin Case Rep, 4 (2016), pp. 535-536
[5]
A. Grammatopoulos, M. Moschou, E. Rigopoulou, et al.
Splenic injury complicating ERCP.
Ann Gastroenterol, 27 (2014), pp. 177-178
[6]
R. Lee, A. Huelsen, N. Saad, et al.
Splenic injury following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a case report and literature review.
Case Rep Gastroenterol, 11 (2017), pp. 241-249
Copyright © 2024. Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología
Download PDF
Idiomas
Revista de Gastroenterología de México
Article options
Tools
es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.